This commit solves the following bug:
127.0.0.1:6379> XGROUP CREATE x grp $ MKSTREAM
OK
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 666 f v
"666-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
2) 1) 1) "666-0"
2) 1) "f"
2) "v"
127.0.0.1:6379> XADD x 667 f v
"667-0"
127.0.0.1:6379> XDEL x 667
(integer) 1
127.0.0.1:6379> XREADGROUP GROUP grp Alice BLOCK 0 STREAMS x >
1) 1) "x"
2) (empty array)
The root cause is that we use s->last_id in streamCompareID
while we should use the last *valid* ID
This commit solves several edge cases that are related to
exhausting the streamID limits: We should correctly calculate
the succeeding streamID instead of blindly incrementing 'seq'
This affects both XREAD and XADD.
Other (unrelated) changes:
Reply with a better error message when trying to add an entry
to a stream that has exhausted last_id
Calling XADD with 0-0 or 0 would result in creating an
empty key and storing it in the database.
Even worse, because XADD will reply with error the action
will not be replicated, creating a master-replica
inconsistency
The XCLAIM docs state the XCLAIM increments the delivery counter for
messages. This PR makes the code match the documentation - which seems
like the desired behaviour - whilst still allowing RETRYCOUNT to be
specified manually.
My understanding of the way streamPropagateXCLAIM() works is that this
change will safely propagate to replicas since retry count is pulled
directly from the streamNACK struct.
Fixes#5194
This should be able to find new bugs and regressions about the new
sorted set update function when ZADD is used to update an element
already existing.
The test is able to find the bug fixed at 2f282aee immediately.
After checking with the community via Twitter (here:
https://twitter.com/antirez/status/915130876861788161) the verdict was to
use ":". However I later realized, after users lamented the fact that
it's hard to copy IDs just with double click, that this was the reason
why I moved to "." in the first instance. Fortunately "-", that was the
other option with most votes, also gets selected with double click on
most terminal applications on Linux and MacOS.
So my reasoning was:
1) We can't retain "." because it's actually confusing to newcomers, it
looks like a floating number, people may be tricked into thinking they
can order IDs numerically as floats.
2) Moving to a double-click-to-select format is much better. People will
work with such IDs for long time when coding / debugging. Why making now
a choice that will impact this for the next years?
The only other viable option was "-", and that's what I did. Thanks.
