mirror of
https://codeberg.org/redict/redict.git
synced 2025-01-23 08:38:27 -05:00
5082ec6419
After checking with the community via Twitter (here: https://twitter.com/antirez/status/915130876861788161) the verdict was to use ":". However I later realized, after users lamented the fact that it's hard to copy IDs just with double click, that this was the reason why I moved to "." in the first instance. Fortunately "-", that was the other option with most votes, also gets selected with double click on most terminal applications on Linux and MacOS. So my reasoning was: 1) We can't retain "." because it's actually confusing to newcomers, it looks like a floating number, people may be tricked into thinking they can order IDs numerically as floats. 2) Moving to a double-click-to-select format is much better. People will work with such IDs for long time when coding / debugging. Why making now a choice that will impact this for the next years? The only other viable option was "-", and that's what I did. Thanks. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| hash.tcl | ||
| incr.tcl | ||
| list-2.tcl | ||
| list-3.tcl | ||
| list-common.tcl | ||
| list.tcl | ||
| set.tcl | ||
| stream.tcl | ||
| string.tcl | ||
| zset.tcl | ||