This caused a crash when adding elements larger than 2GB to a set (same goes for hash keys). See #8455.
Details:
* The fix makes the dict hash functions receive a `size_t` instead of an `int`. In practice the dict hash functions
call siphash which receives a `size_t` and the callers to the hash function pass a `size_t` to it so the fix is trivial.
* The issue was recreated by attempting to add a >2gb value to a set. Appropriate tests were added where I create
a set with large elements and check basic functionality on it (SADD, SCARD, SPOP, etc...).
* When I added the tests I also refactored a bit all the tests code which is run under the `--large-memory` flag.
This removed code duplication for the test framework's `write_big_bulk` and `write_big_bulk` code and also takes
care of not allocating the test frameworks helper huge string used by these tests when not run under `--large-memory`.
* I also added the _violoations.tcl_ unit tests to be part of the entire test suite and leaned up non relevant list related
tests that were in there. This was done in this PR because most of the _violations_ tests are "large memory" tests.
- fix possible heap corruption in ziplist and listpack resulting by trying to
allocate more than the maximum size of 4GB.
- prevent ziplist (hash and zset) from reaching size of above 1GB, will be
converted to HT encoding, that's not a useful size.
- prevent listpack (stream) from reaching size of above 1GB.
- XADD will start a new listpack if the new record may cause the previous
listpack to grow over 1GB.
- XADD will respond with an error if a single stream record is over 1GB
- List type (ziplist in quicklist) was truncating strings that were over 4GB,
now it'll respond with an error.
Co-authored-by: sundb <sundbcn@gmail.com>
