Commit Graph

17 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Drew DeVault
b818f44621 Rename source files and make targets 2024-03-21 10:49:18 +01:00
Binbin
74a6e48a3d
Fix module unblock crash due to no timeout_callback (#13017)
The block timeout is passed in the test case, but we do not pass
in the timeout_callback, and it will crash when unlocking. In this
case, in moduleBlockedClientTimedOut we will check timeout_callback.
There is the stack:
```
beforeSleep
blockedBeforeSleep
handleBlockedClientsTimeout
checkBlockedClientTimeout
unblockClientOnTimeout
replyToBlockedClientTimedOut
moduleBlockedClientTimedOut
-- timeout_callback is NULL, invalidFunctionWasCalled
bc->timeout_callback(&ctx,(void**)c->argv,c->argc);
```
2024-01-31 09:28:50 +02:00
debing.sun
d0640029dc
Fix race condition issues between the main thread and module threads (#12817)
Fix #12785 and other race condition issues.
See the following isolated comments.

The following report was obtained using SANITIZER thread.
```sh
make SANITIZER=thread
./runtest-moduleapi --config io-threads 4 --config io-threads-do-reads yes --accurate
```

1. Fixed thread-safe issue in RM_UnblockClient()
Related discussion:
https://github.com/redis/redis/pull/12817#issuecomment-1831181220
* When blocking a client in a module using `RM_BlockClientOnKeys()` or
`RM_BlockClientOnKeysWithFlags()`
with a timeout_callback, calling RM_UnblockClient() in module threads
can lead to race conditions
     in `updateStatsOnUnblock()`.

     - Introduced: 
        Version: 6.2
        PR: #7491

     - Touch:
`server.stat_numcommands`, `cmd->latency_histogram`, `server.slowlog`,
and `server.latency_events`
     
     - Harm Level: High
Potentially corrupts the memory data of `cmd->latency_histogram`,
`server.slowlog`, and `server.latency_events`

     - Solution:
Differentiate whether the call to moduleBlockedClientTimedOut() comes
from the module or the main thread.
Since we can't know if RM_UnblockClient() comes from module threads, we
always assume it does and
let `updateStatsOnUnblock()` asynchronously update the unblock status.
     
* When error reply is called in timeout_callback(), ctx is not
thread-safe, eventually lead to race conditions in `afterErrorReply`.

     - Introduced: 
        Version: 6.2
        PR: #8217

     - Touch
       `server.stat_total_error_replies`, `server.errors`, 

     - Harm Level: High
       Potentially corrupts the memory data of `server.errors`
   
      - Solution: 
Make the ctx in `timeout_callback()` with `REDISMODULE_CTX_THREAD_SAFE`,
and asynchronously reply errors to the client.

2. Made RM_Reply*() family API thread-safe
Related discussion:
https://github.com/redis/redis/pull/12817#discussion_r1408707239
Call chain: `RM_Reply*()` -> `_addReplyToBufferOrList()` -> touch
server.current_client

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 7.2.0
       PR: #12326

   - Harm Level: None
Since the module fake client won't have the `CLIENT_PUSHING` flag, even
if we touch server.current_client,
     we can still exit after `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING`.

   - Solution
      Checking `c->flags & CLIENT_PUSHING` earlier.

3. Made freeClient() thread-safe
    Fix #12785

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
3fcf959e60

    - Harm Level: Moderate
       * Trigger assertion
It happens when the module thread calls freeClient while the io-thread
is in progress,
which just triggers an assertion, and doesn't make any race condiaions.

* Touch `server.current_client`, `server.stat_clients_type_memory`, and
`clientMemUsageBucket->clients`.
It happens between the main thread and the module threads, may cause
data corruption.
1. Error reset `server.current_client` to NULL, but theoretically this
won't happen,
because the module has already reset `server.current_client` to old
value before entering freeClient.
2. corrupts `clientMemUsageBucket->clients` in
updateClientMemUsageAndBucket().
3. Causes server.stat_clients_type_memory memory statistics to be
inaccurate.
    
    - Solution:
* No longer counts memory usage on fake clients, to avoid updating
`server.stat_clients_type_memory` in freeClient.
* No longer resetting `server.current_client` in unlinkClient, because
the fake client won't be evicted or disconnected in the mid of the
process.
* Judgment assertion `io_threads_op == IO_THREADS_OP_IDLE` only if c is
not a fake client.

4. Fixed free client args without GIL
Related discussion:
https://github.com/redis/redis/pull/12817#discussion_r1408706695
When freeing retained strings in the module thread (refcount decr), or
using them in some way (refcount incr), we should do so while holding
the GIL,
otherwise, they might be simultaneously freed while the main thread is
processing the unblock client state.

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 6.2.0
       PR: #8141

   - Harm Level: Low
     Trigger assertion or double free or memory leak. 

   - Solution:
Documenting that module API users need to ensure any access to these
retained strings is done with the GIL locked

5. Fix adding fake client to server.clients_pending_write
    It will incorrectly log the memory usage for the fake client.
Related discussion:
https://github.com/redis/redis/pull/12817#issuecomment-1851899163

    - Introduced: 
       Version: 4.0
Commit:
9b01b64430

    - Harm Level: None
      Only result in NOP

    - Solution:
       * Don't add fake client into server.clients_pending_write
* Add c->conn assertion for updateClientMemUsageAndBucket() and
updateClientMemoryUsage() to avoid same
         issue in the future.
So now it will be the responsibility of the caller of both of them to
avoid passing in fake client.

6. Fix calling RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart() and
RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeEnd() without GIL
    - Introduced: 
       Version: 6.2
       PR: #7491

   - Harm Level: Low
Causes inaccuracies in command latency histogram and slow logs, but does
not corrupt memory.

   - Solution:
Module API users, if know that non-thread-safe APIs will be used in
multi-threading, need to take responsibility for protecting them with
their own locks instead of the GIL, as using the GIL is too expensive.

### Other issue
1. RM_Yield is not thread-safe, fixed via #12905.

### Summarize
1. Fix thread-safe issues for `RM_UnblockClient()`, `freeClient()` and
`RM_Yield`, potentially preventing memory corruption, data disorder, or
assertion.
2. Updated docs and module test to clarify module API users'
responsibility for locking non-thread-safe APIs in multi-threading, such
as RM_BlockedClientMeasureTimeStart/End(), RM_FreeString(),
RM_RetainString(), and RM_HoldString().

### About backpot to 7.2
1. The implement of (1) is not too satisfying, would like to get more
eyes.
2. (2), (3) can be safely for backport
3. (4), (6) just modifying the module tests and updating the
documentation, no need for a backpot.
4. (5) is harmless, no need for a backpot.

---------

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
2024-01-19 15:12:49 +02:00
Meir Shpilraien (Spielrein)
153f8f082e
Fix use after free on blocking RM_Call. (#12342)
blocking RM_Call was introduced on: #11568, It allows a module to perform
blocking commands and get the reply asynchronously.If the command gets
block, a special promise CallReply is returned that allow to set the unblock
handler. The unblock handler will be called when the command invocation
finish and it gets, as input, the command real reply.

The issue was that the real CallReply was created using a stack allocated
RedisModuleCtx which is no longer available after the unblock handler finishes.
So if the module keeps the CallReply after the unblock handler finished, the
CallReply holds a pointer to invalid memory and will try to access it when the
CallReply will be released.

The solution is to create the CallReply with a NULL context to make it totally
detached and can be freed freely when the module wants.

Test was added to cover this case, running the test with valgrind before the
fix shows the use after free error. With the fix, there are no valgrind errors.

unrelated: adding a missing `$rd close` in many tests in that file.
2023-06-25 14:12:27 +03:00
guybe7
3230199920
Modules: Unblock from within a timer coverage (#12337)
Apart from adding the missing coverage, this PR also adds `blockedBeforeSleep`
that gathers all block-related functions from `beforeSleep`

The order inside `blockedBeforeSleep` is different: now `handleClientsBlockedOnKeys`
(which may unblock clients) is called before `processUnblockedClients` (which handles
unblocked clients).
It makes sense to have this order.

There are no visible effects of the wrong ordering, except some cleanups of the now-unblocked
client would have  happen in the next `beforeSleep` (will now happen in the current one)

The reason we even got into it is because i triggers an assertion in logresreq.c (breaking
the assumption that `unblockClient` is called **before** actually flushing the reply to the socket):
`handleClientsBlockedOnKeys` is called, then it calls `moduleUnblockClientOnKey`, which calls
`moduleUnblockClient`, which adds the client to `moduleUnblockedClients` back to `beforeSleep`,
we call `handleClientsWithPendingWritesUsingThreads`, it writes the data of buf to the client, so
`client->bufpos` became 0
On the next `beforeSleep`, we call `moduleHandleBlockedClients`, which calls `unblockClient`,
which calls `reqresAppendResponse`, triggering the assert. (because the `bufpos` is 0) - see https://github.com/redis/redis/pull/12301#discussion_r1226386716
2023-06-22 23:15:16 +03:00
Meir Shpilraien (Spielrein)
d0da0a6a3f
Support for RM_Call on blocking commands (#11568)
Allow running blocking commands from within a module using `RM_Call`.

Today, when `RM_Call` is used, the fake client that is used to run command
is marked with `CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING` flag. This flag tells the command
that it is not allowed to block the client and in case it needs to block, it must
fallback to some alternative (either return error or perform some default behavior).
For example, `BLPOP` fallback to simple `LPOP` if it is not allowed to block.

All the commands must respect the `CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING` flag (including
module commands). When the command invocation finished, Redis asserts that
the client was not blocked.

This PR introduces the ability to call blocking command using `RM_Call` by
passing a callback that will be called when the client will get unblocked.
In order to do that, the user must explicitly say that he allow to perform blocking
command by passing a new format specifier argument, `K`, to the `RM_Call`
function. This new flag will tell Redis that it is allow to run blocking command
and block the client. In case the command got blocked, Redis will return a new
type of call reply (`REDISMODULE_REPLY_PROMISE`). This call reply indicates
that the command got blocked and the user can set the on_unblocked handler using
`RM_CallReplyPromiseSetUnblockHandler`.

When clients gets unblocked, it eventually reaches `processUnblockedClients` function.
This is where we check if the client is a fake module client and if it is, we call the unblock
callback instead of performing the usual unblock operations.

**Notice**: `RM_CallReplyPromiseSetUnblockHandler` must be called atomically
along side the command invocation (without releasing the Redis lock in between).
In addition, unlike other CallReply types, the promise call reply must be released
by the module when the Redis GIL is acquired.

The module can abort the execution on the blocking command (if it was not yet
executed) using `RM_CallReplyPromiseAbort`. the API will return `REDISMODULE_OK`
on success and `REDISMODULE_ERR` if the operation is already executed.
**Notice** that in case of misbehave module, Abort might finished successfully but the
operation will not really be aborted. This can only happened if the module do not respect
the disconnect callback of the blocked client. 
For pure Redis commands this can not happened.

### Atomicity Guarantees

The API promise that the unblock handler will run atomically as an execution unit.
This means that all the operation performed on the unblock handler will be wrapped
with a multi exec transaction when replicated to the replica and AOF.
The API **do not** grantee any other atomicity properties such as when the unblock
handler will be called. This gives us the flexibility to strengthen the grantees (or not)
in the future if we will decide that we need a better guarantees.

That said, the implementation **does** provide a better guarantees when performing
pure Redis blocking command like `BLPOP`. In this case the unblock handler will run
atomically with the operation that got unblocked (for example, in case of `BLPOP`, the
unblock handler will run atomically with the `LPOP` operation that run when the command
got unblocked). This is an implementation detail that might be change in the future and the
module writer should not count on that.

### Calling blocking commands while running on script mode (`S`)

`RM_Call` script mode (`S`) was introduced on #0372. It is used for usecases where the
command that was invoked on `RM_Call` comes from a user input and we want to make
sure the user will not run dangerous commands like `shutdown`. Some command, such
as `BLPOP`, are marked with `NO_SCRIPT` flag, which means they will not be allowed on
script mode. Those commands are marked with  `NO_SCRIPT` just because they are
blocking commands and not because they are dangerous. Now that we can run blocking
commands on RM_Call, there is no real reason not to allow such commands on script mode.

The underline problem is that the `NO_SCRIPT` flag is abused to also mark some of the
blocking commands (notice that those commands know not to block the client if it is not
allowed to do so, and have a fallback logic to such cases. So even if those commands
were not marked with `NO_SCRIPT` flag, it would not harm Redis, and today we can
already run those commands within multi exec).

In addition, not all blocking commands are marked with `NO_SCRIPT` flag, for example
`blmpop` are not marked and can run from within a script.

Those facts shows that there are some ambiguity about the meaning of the `NO_SCRIPT`
flag, and its not fully clear where it should be use.

The PR suggest that blocking commands should not be marked with `NO_SCRIPT` flag,
those commands should handle `CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING` flag and only block when
it's safe (like they already does today). To achieve that, the PR removes the `NO_SCRIPT`
flag from the following commands:
* `blmove`
* `blpop`
* `brpop`
* `brpoplpush`
* `bzpopmax`
* `bzpopmin`
* `wait`

This might be considered a breaking change as now, on scripts, instead of getting
`command is not allowed from script` error, the user will get some fallback behavior
base on the command implementation. That said, the change matches the behavior
of scripts and multi exec with respect to those commands and allow running them on
`RM_Call` even when script mode is used.

### Additional RedisModule API and changes

* `RM_BlockClientSetPrivateData` - Set private data on the blocked client without the
  need to unblock the client. This allows up to set the promise CallReply as the private
  data of the blocked client and abort it if the client gets disconnected.
* `RM_BlockClientGetPrivateData` - Return the current private data set on a blocked client.
  We need it so we will have access to this private data on the disconnect callback.
* On RM_Call, the returned reply will be added to the auto memory context only if auto
  memory is enabled, this allows us to keep the call reply for longer time then the context
  lifetime and does not force an unneeded borrow relationship between the CallReply and
  the RedisModuleContext.
2023-03-16 14:04:31 +02:00
Meir Shpilraien (Spielrein)
61baabd8d5
Fix crash on RM_Call with script mode. (#10886)
The PR fixes 2 issues:

### RM_Call crash on script mode

`RM_Call` can potentially be called from a background thread where `server.current_client`
are not set. In such case we get a crash on `NULL` dereference.
The fix is to check first if `server.current_client` is `NULL`, if it does we should
verify disc errors and readonly replica as we do to any normal clients (no masters nor AOF).

### RM_Call block OOM commands when not needed

Again `RM_Call` can be executed on a background thread using a `ThreadSafeCtx`.
In such case `server.pre_command_oom_state` can be irrelevant and should not be
considered when check OOM state. This cause OOM commands to be blocked when
not necessarily needed.

In such case, check the actual used memory (and not the cached value). Notice that in
order to know if the cached value can be used, we check that the ctx that was used on
the `RM_Call` is a ThreadSafeCtx. Module writer can potentially abuse the API and use
ThreadSafeCtx on the main thread. We consider this as a API miss used.
2022-06-21 10:01:13 +03:00
Meir Shpilraien (Spielrein)
f3855a0930
Add new RM_Call flags for script mode, no writes, and error replies. (#10372)
The PR extends RM_Call with 3 new capabilities using new flags that
are given to RM_Call as part of the `fmt` argument.
It aims to assist modules that are getting a list of commands to be
executed from the user (not hard coded as part of the module logic),
think of a module that implements a new scripting language...

* `S` - Run the command in a script mode, this means that it will raise an
  error if a command which are not allowed inside a script (flaged with the
  `deny-script` flag) is invoked (like SHUTDOWN). In addition, on script mode,
  write commands are not allowed if there is not enough good replicas (as
  configured with `min-replicas-to-write`) and/or a disk error happened.

* `W` - no writes mode, Redis will reject any command that is marked with `write`
  flag. Again can be useful to modules that implement a new scripting language
  and wants to prevent any write commands.

* `E` - Return errors as RedisModuleCallReply. Today the errors that happened
  before the command was invoked (like unknown commands or acl error) return
  a NULL reply and set errno. This might be missing important information about
  the failure and it is also impossible to just pass the error to the user using
  RM_ReplyWithCallReply. This new flag allows you to get a RedisModuleCallReply
  object with the relevant error message and treat it as if it was an error that was
  raised by the command invocation.

Tests were added to verify the new code paths.

In addition small refactoring was done to share some code between modules,
scripts, and `processCommand` function:
1. `getAclErrorMessage` was added to `acl.c` to unified to log message extraction
  from the acl result
2. `checkGoodReplicasStatus` was added to `replication.c` to check the status of
  good replicas. It is used on `scriptVerifyWriteCommandAllow`, `RM_Call`, and
  `processCommand`.
3. `writeCommandsGetDiskErrorMessage` was added to `server.c` to get the error
  message on persistence failure. Again it is used on `scriptVerifyWriteCommandAllow`,
  `RM_Call`, and `processCommand`.
2022-03-22 14:13:28 +02:00
perryitay
c4b788230c
Adding module api for processing commands during busy jobs and allow flagging the commands that should be handled at this status (#9963)
Some modules might perform a long-running logic in different stages of Redis lifetime, for example:
* command execution
* RDB loading
* thread safe context

During this long-running logic Redis is not responsive.

This PR offers 
1. An API to process events while a busy command is running (`RM_Yield`)
2. A new flag (`ALLOW_BUSY`) to mark the commands that should be handled during busy
  jobs which can also be used by modules (`allow-busy`)
3. In slow commands and thread safe contexts, this flag will start rejecting commands with -BUSY only
  after `busy-reply-threshold`
4. During loading (`rdb_load` callback), it'll process events right away (not wait for `busy-reply-threshold`),
  but either way, the processing is throttled to the server hz rate.
5. Allow modules to Yield to redis background tasks, but not to client commands

* rename `script-time-limit` to `busy-reply-threshold` (an alias to the pre-7.0 `lua-time-limit`)

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
2022-01-20 09:05:53 +02:00
Viktor Söderqvist
e4b3a257ee
Modules: Mark all APIs non-experimental (#9983)
These exist for quite some time, and are no longer experimental
2021-12-30 12:17:22 +02:00
Viktor Söderqvist
acf3495eb8
Sort out the mess around writable replicas and lookupKeyRead/Write (#9572)
Writable replicas now no longer use the values of expired keys. Expired keys are
deleted when lookupKeyWrite() is used, even on a writable replica. Previously,
writable replicas could use the value of an expired key in write commands such
as INCR, SUNIONSTORE, etc..

This commit also sorts out the mess around the functions lookupKeyRead() and
lookupKeyWrite() so they now indicate what we intend to do with the key and
are not affected by the command calling them.

Multi-key commands like SUNIONSTORE, ZUNIONSTORE, COPY and SORT with the
store option now use lookupKeyRead() for the keys they're reading from (which will
not allow reading from logically expired keys).

This commit also fixes a bug where PFCOUNT could return a value of an
expired key.

Test modules commands have their readonly and write flags updated to correctly
reflect their lookups for reading or writing. Modules are not required to
correctly reflect this in their command flags, but this change is made for
consistency since the tests serve as usage examples.

Fixes #6842. Fixes #7475.
2021-11-28 11:26:28 +02:00
Shaya Potter
cf860df599
Fix module blocked clients RESP version (#9634)
Before this commit, module blocked clients did not carry through the original RESP version, resulting with RESP3 clients receiving unexpected RESP2 replies.
2021-10-21 14:01:10 +03:00
Oran Agra
48efc25f74
Handle output buffer limits for Module blocked clients (#8141)
Module blocked clients cache the response in a temporary client,
the reply list in this client would be affected by the recent fix
in #7202, but when the reply is later copied into the real client,
it would have bypassed all the checks for output buffer limit, which
would have resulted in both: responding with a partial response to
the client, and also not disconnecting it at all.
2020-12-08 16:41:20 +02:00
Meir Shpilraien (Spielrein)
d87a0d0286
Unified MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call with respect to blocking commands (#8025)
Blocking command should not be used with MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call. This is because,
the caller, who executes the command in this context, expects a reply.

Today, LUA and MULTI have a special (and different) treatment to blocking commands:

LUA   - Most commands are marked with no-script flag which are checked when executing
and command from LUA, commands that are not marked (like XREAD) verify that their
blocking mode is not used inside LUA (by checking the CLIENT_LUA client flag).
MULTI - Command that is going to block, first verify that the client is not inside
multi (by checking the CLIENT_MULTI client flag). If the client is inside multi, they
return a result which is a match to the empty key with no timeout (for example blpop
inside MULTI will act as lpop)
For modules that perform RM_Call with blocking command, the returned results type is
REDISMODULE_REPLY_UNKNOWN and the caller can not really know what happened.

Disadvantages of the current state are:

No unified approach, LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call, each has a different treatment
Module can not safely execute blocking command (and get reply or error).
Though It is true that modules are not like LUA or MULTI and should be smarter not
to execute blocking commands on RM_Call, sometimes you want to execute a command base
on client input (for example if you create a module that provides a new scripting
language like javascript or python).
While modules (on modules command) can check for REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_LUA or
REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_MULTI to know not to block the client, there is no way to
check if the command came from another module using RM_Call. So there is no way
for a module to know not to block another module RM_Call execution.

This commit adds a way to unify the treatment for blocking clients by introducing
a new CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING client flag. On LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call the new flag
turned on to signify that the client should not be blocked. A blocking command
verifies that the flag is turned off before blocking. If a blocking command sees
that the CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag is on, it's not blocking and return results
which are matches to empty key with no timeout (as MULTI does today).

The new flag is checked on the following commands:

List blocking commands: BLPOP, BRPOP, BRPOPLPUSH, BLMOVE,
Zset blocking commands: BZPOPMIN, BZPOPMAX
Stream blocking commands: XREAD, XREADGROUP
SUBSCRIBE, PSUBSCRIBE, MONITOR
In addition, the new flag is turned on inside the AOF client, we do not want to
block the AOF client to prevent deadlocks and commands ordering issues (and there
is also an existing assert in the code that verifies it).

To keep backward compatibility on LUA, all the no-script flags on existing commands
were kept untouched. In addition, a LUA special treatment on XREAD and XREADGROUP was kept.

To keep backward compatibility on MULTI (which today allows SUBSCRIBE, and PSUBSCRIBE).
We added a special treatment on those commands to allow executing them on MULTI.

The only backward compatibility issue that this PR introduces is that now MONITOR
is not allowed inside MULTI.

Tests were added to verify blocking commands are not blocking the client on LUA, MULTI,
or RM_Call. Tests were added to verify the module can check for CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag.

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com>
2020-11-17 18:58:55 +02:00
Meir Shpilraien (Spielrein)
adc3183cd2
Add Module API for version and compatibility checks (#7865)
* Introduce a new API's: RM_GetContextFlagsAll, and
RM_GetKeyspaceNotificationFlagsAll that will return the
full flags mask of each feature. The module writer can
check base on this value if the Flags he needs are
supported or not.

* For each flag, introduce a new value on redismodule.h,
this value represents the LAST value and should be there
as a reminder to update it when a new value is added,
also it will be used in the code to calculate the full
flags mask (assuming flags are incrementally increasing).
In addition, stated that the module writer should not use
the LAST flag directly and he should use the GetFlagAll API's.

* Introduce a new API: RM_IsSubEventSupported, that returns for a given
event and subevent, whether or not the subevent supported.

* Introduce a new macro RMAPI_FUNC_SUPPORTED(func) that returns whether
or not a function API is supported by comparing it to NULL.

* Introduce a new API: int RM_GetServerVersion();, that will return the
current Redis version in the format 0x00MMmmpp; e.g. 0x00060008;

* Changed unstable version from 999.999.999 to 255.255.255

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Co-authored-by: Yossi Gottlieb <yossigo@gmail.com>
2020-10-11 17:21:58 +03:00
Oran Agra
8ea131fc80
Fix leak in new blockedclient module API test (#7780) 2020-09-10 10:22:16 +03:00
Roi Lipman
042189fd87
RM_ThreadSafeContextTryLock a non-blocking method for acquiring GIL (#7738)
Co-authored-by: Yossi Gottlieb <yossigo@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
2020-09-09 16:01:16 +03:00