these metrics become negative when RSS is smaller than the used_memory.
This can easily happen when the program allocated a lot of memory and haven't
written to it yet, in which case the kernel doesn't allocate any pages to the process
If we encounter an unsupported protocol in the "bind" list, don't
ipso-facto consider it a fatal error. We continue to abort startup if
there are no listening sockets at all.
This ensures that the lack of IPv6 support does not prevent Redis from
starting on Debian where we try to bind to the ::1 interface by default
(via "bind 127.0.0.1 ::1"). A machine with IPv6 disabled (such as some
container systems) would simply fail to start Redis after the initiall
call to apt(8).
This is similar to the case for where "bind" is not specified:
https://github.com/antirez/redis/issues/3894
... and was based on the corresponding PR:
https://github.com/antirez/redis/pull/4108
... but also adds EADDRNOTAVAIL to the list of errors to catch which I
believe is missing from there.
This issue was raised in Debian as both <https://bugs.debian.org/900284>
& <https://bugs.debian.org/914354>.
This really helps spot it in the logs, otherwise it does not look like a
warning/error. For example:
Creating Server TCP listening socket ::1:6379: bind: Cannot assign requested address
... is not nearly as clear as:
Could not create server TCP listening listening socket ::1:6379: bind: Cannot assign requested address
server.hz was uninitialized between initServerConfig and initServer.
this can lead to someone (e.g. queued modules) doing createObject,
and accessing an uninitialized variable, that can potentially be 0,
and lead to a crash.
When HAVE_MALLOC_SIZE is false, each call to zrealloc causes used_memory
to increase by PREFIX_SIZE more than it should, due to mis-matched
accounting between the original zmalloc (which includes PREFIX size in
its increment) and zrealloc (which misses it from its decrement).
I've also supplied a command-line test to easily demonstrate the
problem. It's not wired into the test framework, because I don't know
TCL so I'm not sure how to automate it.
xadd with id * generates random stream id
xadd & xtrim with approximate maxlen count may
trim stream randomly
xinfo may get random radix-tree-keys/nodes
xpending may get random idletime
xclaim: master and slave may have different
idletime in stream
Processing command from the master while the slave is in busy state is
not correct, however we cannot, also, just reply -BUSY to the
replication stream commands from the master. The correct solution is to
stop processing data from the master, but just accumulate the stream
into the buffers and resume the processing later.
Related to #5297.
Note: this breaks backward compatibility with Redis 4, since now slaves
by default are exact copies of masters and do not try to evict keys
independently.
User: "is there a reason why redis server logs are missing the year in
the "date time"?"
Me: "I guess I did not imagine it would be stable enough to run for
several years".
The slave sends \n keepalive messages to the master while parsing the rdb,
and later sends REPLCONF ACK once a second. rarely, the master recives both
a linefeed char and a REPLCONF in the same read, \n*3\r\n$8\r\nREPLCONF\r\n...
and it tries to trim two chars (\r\n) from the query buffer,
trimming the '*' from *3\r\n$8\r\nREPLCONF\r\n...
then the master tries to process a command starting with '3' and replies to
the slave a bunch of -ERR and one +OK.
although the slave silently ignores these (prints a log message), this corrupts
the replication offset at the slave since the slave increases the replication
offset, and the master did not.
other than the fix in processInlineBuffer, i did several other improvments
while hunting this very rare bug.
- when redis replies with "unknown command" it includes a portion of the
arguments, not just the command name. so it would be easier to understand
what was recived, in my case, on the slave side, it was -ERR, but
the "arguments" were the interesting part (containing info on the error).
- about a year ago i added code in addReplyErrorLength to print the error to
the log in case of a reply to master (since this string isn't actually
trasmitted to the master), now changed that block to print a similar log
message to indicate an error being sent from the master to the slave.
note that the slave is marked as CLIENT_SLAVE only after PSYNC was received,
so this will not cause any harm for REPLCONF, and will only indicate problems
that are gonna corrupt the replication stream anyway.
- two places were c->reply was emptied, and i wanted to reset sentlen
this is a precaution (i did not actually see such a problem), since a
non-zero sentlen will cause corruption to be transmitted on the socket.
A) slave buffers didn't count internal fragmentation and sds unused space,
this caused them to induce eviction although we didn't mean for it.
B) slave buffers were consuming about twice the memory of what they actually needed.
- this was mainly due to sdsMakeRoomFor growing to twice as much as needed each time
but networking.c not storing more than 16k (partially fixed recently in 237a38737).
- besides it wasn't able to store half of the new string into one buffer and the
other half into the next (so the above mentioned fix helped mainly for small items).
- lastly, the sds buffers had up to 30% internal fragmentation that was wasted,
consumed but not used.
C) inefficient performance due to starting from a small string and reallocing many times.
what i changed:
- creating dedicated buffers for reply list, counting their size with zmalloc_size
- when creating a new reply node from, preallocate it to at least 16k.
- when appending a new reply to the buffer, first fill all the unused space of the
previous node before starting a new one.
other changes:
- expose mem_not_counted_for_evict info field for the benefit of the test suite
- add a test to make sure slave buffers are counted correctly and that they don't cause eviction
With such information will be able to use a private localtime()
implementation serverLog(), which does not use any locking and is both
thread and fork() safe.
