Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Binbin
23325c135f
sub-command support for ACL CAT and COMMAND LIST. redisCommand always stores fullname (#10127)
Summary of changes:
1. Rename `redisCommand->name` to `redisCommand->declared_name`, it is a
  const char * for native commands and SDS for module commands.
2. Store the [sub]command fullname in `redisCommand->fullname` (sds).
3. List subcommands in `ACL CAT`
4. List subcommands in `COMMAND LIST`
5. `moduleUnregisterCommands` now will also free the module subcommands.
6. RM_GetCurrentCommandName returns full command name

Other changes:
1. Add `addReplyErrorArity` and `addReplyErrorExpireTime`
2. Remove `getFullCommandName` function that now is useless.
3. Some cleanups about `fullname` since now it is SDS.
4. Delete `populateSingleCommand` function from server.h that is useless.
5. Added tests to cover this change.
6. Add some module unload tests and fix the leaks
7. Make error messages uniform, make sure they always contain the full command
  name and that it's quoted.
7. Fixes some typos

see the history in #9504, fixes #10124

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
Co-authored-by: guybe7 <guy.benoish@redislabs.com>
2022-01-23 10:05:06 +02:00
zhaozhao.zz
2e1979a21e
use startEvictionTimeProc() in config set maxmemory (#10019)
This would mean that the effects of `CONFIG SET maxmemory` may not be visible once the command returns.
That could anyway happen since incremental eviction was added in redis 6.2 (see #7653)

We do this to fix one of the propagation bugs about eviction see #9890 and #10014.
2022-01-04 13:08:10 +02:00
guybe7
266d95066d
Remove incomplete fix of a broader problem (#10013)
Preventing COFIG SET maxmemory from propagating is just the tip of the iceberg.
Module that performs a write operation in a notification can cause any
command to be propagated, based on server.dirty

We need to come up with a better solution.
2021-12-28 10:19:58 +02:00
guybe7
0f15e025e6
Fix race in propagation test (#10012)
There's a race between testing DBSIZE and the thread starting.
If the thread hadn't started by the time we checked DBISZE, no
keys will have been evicted.
The correct way is to check the evicted_keys stat.
2021-12-27 12:31:24 +02:00
guybe7
7ac213079c
Sort out mess around propagation and MULTI/EXEC (#9890)
The mess:
Some parts use alsoPropagate for late propagation, others using an immediate one (propagate()),
causing edge cases, ugly/hacky code, and the tendency for bugs

The basic idea is that all commands are propagated via alsoPropagate (i.e. added to a list) and the
top-most call() is responsible for going over that list and actually propagating them (and wrapping
them in MULTI/EXEC if there's more than one command). This is done in the new function,
propagatePendingCommands.

Callers to propagatePendingCommands:
1. top-most call() (we want all nested call()s to add to the also_propagate array and just the top-most
   one to propagate them) - via `afterCommand`
2. handleClientsBlockedOnKeys: it is out of call() context and it may propagate stuff - via `afterCommand`. 
3. handleClientsBlockedOnKeys edge case: if the looked-up key is already expired, we will propagate the
   expire but will not unblock any client so `afterCommand` isn't called. in that case, we have to propagate
   the deletion explicitly.
4. cron stuff: active-expire and eviction may also propagate stuff
5. modules: the module API allows to propagate stuff from just about anywhere (timers, keyspace notifications,
   threads). I could have tried to catch all the out-of-call-context places but it seemed easier to handle it in one
   place: when we free the context. in the spirit of what was done in call(), only the top-most freeing of a module
   context may cause propagation.
6. modules: when using a thread-safe ctx it's not clear when/if the ctx will be freed. we do know that the module
   must lock the GIL before calling RM_Replicate/RM_Call so we propagate the pending commands when
   releasing the GIL.

A "known limitation", which were actually a bug, was fixed because of this commit (see propagate.tcl):
   When using a mix of RM_Call with `!` and RM_Replicate, the command would propagate out-of-order:
   first all the commands from RM_Call, and then the ones from RM_Replicate

Another thing worth mentioning is that if, in the past, a client would issue a MULTI/EXEC with just one
write command the server would blindly propagate the MULTI/EXEC too, even though it's redundant.
not anymore.

This commit renames propagate() to propagateNow() in order to cause conflicts in pending PRs.
propagatePendingCommands is the only caller of propagateNow, which is now a static, internal helper function.

Optimizations:
1. alsoPropagate will not add stuff to also_propagate if there's no AOF and replicas
2. alsoPropagate reallocs also_propagagte exponentially, to save calls to memmove

Bugfixes:
1. CONFIG SET can create evictions, sending notifications which can cause to dirty++ with modules.
   we need to prevent it from propagating to AOF/replicas
2. We need to set current_client in RM_Call. buggy scenario:
   - CONFIG SET maxmemory, eviction notifications, module hook calls RM_Call
   - assertion in lookupKey crashes, because current_client has CONFIG SET, which isn't CMD_WRITE
3. minor: in eviction, call propagateDeletion after notification, like active-expire and all commands
   (we always send a notification before propagating the command)
2021-12-23 00:03:48 +02:00
guybe7
f40ca9cb58
Modules: Replicate lazy-expire even if replication is not allowed (#8816)
Before this commit using RM_Call without "!" could cause the master
to lazy-expire a key (delete it) but without replicating to replicas.
This could cause the replica's memory usage to gradually grow and
could also cause consistency issues if the master and replica have
a clock diff.
This bug was introduced in #8617

Added a test which demonstrates that scenario.
2021-04-19 17:16:02 +03:00
guybe7
dba33a943d
Missing EXEC on modules propagation after failed EVAL execution (#8654)
1. moduleReplicateMultiIfNeeded should use server.in_eval like
   moduleHandlePropagationAfterCommandCallback
2. server.in_eval could have been set to 1 and not reset back
   to 0 (a lot of missed early-exits after in_eval is already 1)

Note: The new assertions in processCommand cover (2) and I added
two module tests to cover (1)

Implications:
If an EVAL that failed (and thus left server.in_eval=1) runs before a module
command that replicates, the replication stream will contain MULTI (because
moduleReplicateMultiIfNeeded used to check server.lua_caller which is NULL
at this point) but not EXEC (because server.in_eval==1)
This only affects modules as module.c the only user of server.in_eval.

Affects versions 6.2.0, 6.2.1
2021-03-15 21:19:57 +02:00
guybe7
3d0b427c30
Fix some issues with modules and MULTI/EXEC (#8617)
Bug 1:
When a module ctx is freed moduleHandlePropagationAfterCommandCallback
is called and handles propagation. We want to prevent it from propagating
commands that were not replicated by the same context. Example:
1. module1.foo does: RM_Replicate(cmd1); RM_Call(cmd2); RM_Replicate(cmd3)
2. RM_Replicate(cmd1) propagates MULTI and adds cmd1 to also_propagagte
3. RM_Call(cmd2) create a new ctx, calls call() and destroys the ctx.
4. moduleHandlePropagationAfterCommandCallback is called, calling
   alsoPropagates EXEC (Note: EXEC is still not written to socket),
   setting server.in_trnsaction = 0
5. RM_Replicate(cmd3) is called, propagagting yet another MULTI (now
   we have nested MULTI calls, which is no good) and then cmd3

We must prevent RM_Call(cmd2) from resetting server.in_transaction.
REDISMODULE_CTX_MULTI_EMITTED was revived for that purpose.

Bug 2:
Fix issues with nested RM_Call where some have '!' and some don't.
Example:
1. module1.foo does RM_Call of module2.bar without replication (i.e. no '!')
2. module2.bar internally calls RM_Call of INCR with '!'
3. at the end of module1.foo we call RM_ReplicateVerbatim

We want the replica/AOF to see only module1.foo and not the INCR from module2.bar

Introduced a global replication_allowed flag inside RM_Call to determine
whether we need to replicate or not (even if '!' was specified)

Other changes:
Split beforePropagateMultiOrExec to beforePropagateMulti afterPropagateExec
just for better readability
2021-03-10 18:02:17 +02:00
Oran Agra
411c18bbce
Remove read-only flag from non-keyspace cmds, different approach for EXEC to propagate MULTI (#8216)
In the distant history there was only the read flag for commands, and whatever
command that didn't have the read flag was a write one.
Then we added the write flag, but some portions of the code still used !read
Also some commands that don't work on the keyspace at all, still have the read
flag.

Changes in this commit:
1. remove the read-only flag from TIME, ECHO, ROLE and LASTSAVE

2. EXEC command used to decides if it should propagate a MULTI by looking at
   the command flags (!read & !admin).
   When i was about to change it to look at the write flag instead, i realized
   that this would cause it not to propagate a MULTI for PUBLISH, EVAL, and
   SCRIPT, all 3 are not marked as either a read command or a write one (as
   they should), but all 3 are calling forceCommandPropagation.

   So instead of introducing a new flag to denote a command that "writes" but
   not into the keyspace, and still needs propagation, i decided to rely on
   the forceCommandPropagation, and just fix the code to propagate MULTI when
   needed rather than depending on the command flags at all.

   The implication of my change then is that now it won't decide to propagate
   MULTI when it sees one of these: SELECT, PING, INFO, COMMAND, TIME and
   other commands which are neither read nor write.

3. Changing getNodeByQuery and clusterRedirectBlockedClientIfNeeded in
   cluster.c to look at !write rather than read flag.
   This should have no implications, since these code paths are only reachable
   for commands which access keys, and these are always marked as either read
   or write.

This commit improve MULTI propagation tests, for modules and a bunch of
other special cases, all of which used to pass already before that commit.
the only one that test change that uncovered a change of behavior is the
one that DELs a non-existing key, it used to propagate an empty
multi-exec block, and no longer does.
2020-12-22 12:03:49 +02:00
Guy Benoish
d6eb3afd13 Modules: Test MULTI/EXEC replication of RM_Replicate
Makse sure call() doesn't wrap replicated commands with
a redundant MULTI/EXEC

Other, unrelated changes:
1. Formatting compiler warning in INFO CLIENTS
2. Use CLIENT_ID_AOF instead of UINT64_MAX
2020-03-31 13:55:51 +03:00
antirez
4379b8b411 Fix the propagate Tcl test after module changes. 2020-03-31 12:09:38 +02:00
antirez
1b8b8c029f Modules: add RM_Replicate() Tcl test file & fix the module. 2019-10-03 18:44:50 +02:00