Is it sufficient... ? -- Yes it is. In standalone mode, we say READY=1
at the comment point; however in replicated mode, we delay sending
READY=1 until the replication sync completes.
This adds Makefile/build-system support for USE_SYSTEMD=(yes|no|*). This
variable's value determines whether or not libsystemd will be linked at
build-time.
If USE_SYSTEMD is set to "yes", make will use PKG_CONFIG to check for
libsystemd's presence, and fail the build early if it isn't
installed/detected properly.
If USE_SYSTEM is set to "no", libsystemd will *not* be linked, even if
support for it is available on the system redis is being built on.
For any other value that USE_SYSTEM might assume (e.g. "auto"),
PKG_CONFIG will try to determine libsystemd's presence, and set up the
build process to link against it, if it was indicated as being
installed/available.
This approach has a number of repercussions of its own, most importantly
the following: If you build redis on a system that actually has systemd
support, but no libsystemd-dev package(s) installed, you'll end up
*without* support for systemd notification/status reporting support in
redis-server. This changes established runtime behaviour.
I'm not sure if the build system and/or the server binary should
indicate this. I'm also wondering if not actually having
systemd-notify-support, but requesting it via the server's config,
should result in a fatal error now.
Instead of replicating a subset of libsystemd's sd_notify(3) internally,
use the dynamic library provided by systemd to communicate with the
service manager.
When systemd supervision was auto-detected or configured, communicate
the actual server status (i.e. "Loading dataset", "Waiting for
master<->replica sync") to systemd, instead of declaring readiness right
after initializing the server process.
This is a light-weight replace function, useful for use cases such as
realloc()ing an existing value, etc. Using RM_ModuleTypeSetValue() in
such cases is wasteful and complex as it attempts to delete the old
value, call its destructor, etc.
Calling XADD with 0-0 or 0 would result in creating an
empty key and storing it in the database.
Even worse, because XADD will reply with error the action
will not be replicated, creating a master-replica
inconsistency
Reduce default minimum effort, so that when fragmentation is just detected,
the impact on the latency will be minor.
Reduce the default maximum effort, mainly to prevent a case were a sudden
massive deletions, won't trigger an aggressive defrag that will cause latency.
When activedefrag is disabled mid-run, reset the 'running' info field, and
clear the scan cursor, so that when it'll be re-enabled, a new fresh scan will
start.
Clearing the 'running' variable is important since lowering the defragger
tunables mid-scan won't help, the defragger only considers new threshold when
a new scan starts, and during a scan it can only become more aggressive,
(when more severe fragmentation is detected), it'll never go less aggressive.
So by temporarily disabling activedefrag, one can lower th the tunables.
Removing the experimantal warning.
- Adding RM_ScanKey
- Adding tests for RM_ScanKey
- Refactoring RM_Scan API
Changes in RM_Scan
- cleanup in docs and coding convention
- Moving out of experimantal Api
- Adding ctx to scan callback
- Dont use cursor of -1 as an indication of done (can be a valid cursor)
- Set errno when returning 0 for various reasons
- Rename Cursor to ScanCursor
- Test filters key that are not strings, and opens a key if NULL
The implementation expose the following new functions:
1. RedisModule_CursorCreate - allow to create a new cursor object for
keys scanning
2. RedisModule_CursorRestart - restart an existing cursor to restart the
scan
3. RedisModule_CursorDestroy - destroy an existing cursor
4. RedisModule_Scan - scan keys
The RedisModule_Scan function gets a cursor object, a callback and void*
(used as user private data).
The callback will be called for each key in the database proving the key
name and the value as RedisModuleKey.
- the API name was odd, separated to two apis one for LRU and one for LFU
- the LRU idle time was in 1 second resolution, which might be ok for RDB
and RESTORE, but i think modules may need higher resolution
- adding tests for LFU and for handling maxmemory policy mismatch
