From 8627751ec64e40181e3acfc53b3e2f73a3730cb7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wang Yuan <wangyuan21@baidu.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 20:04:17 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Make aof buf alloc size more accurate in overhead (#8970)

In theory we should have used zmalloc_usable_size, but it may be slower,
and now after #7875, there's no actual difference.
So this change isn't making a dramatic change.

Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com>
---
 src/evict.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/evict.c b/src/evict.c
index d3cdaaa80..2f94f5942 100644
--- a/src/evict.c
+++ b/src/evict.c
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ size_t freeMemoryGetNotCountedMemory(void) {
         }
     }
     if (server.aof_state != AOF_OFF) {
-        overhead += sdsalloc(server.aof_buf)+aofRewriteBufferSize();
+        overhead += sdsAllocSize(server.aof_buf)+aofRewriteBufferSize();
     }
     return overhead;
 }