Fixed typos in dictScan() comment.

This commit is contained in:
antirez 2013-10-25 17:05:55 +02:00
parent 34c207227c
commit 7bd45659b9

View File

@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ static unsigned long rev(unsigned long v) {
* (in binary) 1111. The position of a key in the hash table will be always
* the last four bits of the hash output, and so forth.
*
* WHAT HAPPENS DURING REHASHING, WHEN YOU HAVE TWO TABLES?
* WHAT HAPPENS IF THE TABLE CHANGES IN SIZE?
*
* If the hash table grows, elements can go anyway in one multiple of
* the old bucket: for example let's say that we already iterated with
@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ static unsigned long rev(unsigned long v) {
* as we are sure that, we tried for example, both 0111 and 1111 (all the
* variations of the higher bit) so we don't need to test it again.
*
* But wait... You have *two* tables in a given moment during rehashing!
* WAIT... YOU HAVE *TWO* TABLES DURING REHASHING!
*
* Yes, this is true, but we always iterate the smaller one of the tables,
* testing also all the expansions of the current cursor into the larger