mirror of
https://codeberg.org/redict/redict.git
synced 2025-01-23 00:28:26 -05:00
PSYNC2: reorganize comments related to recent fixes.
Related to PR #4412 and issue #4407.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9d86ae4597
commit
4d063bb6ba
27
src/rdb.c
27
src/rdb.c
@ -2039,19 +2039,16 @@ rdbSaveInfo *rdbPopulateSaveInfo(rdbSaveInfo *rsi) {
|
|||||||
* only when repl_backlog is not NULL. If the repl_backlog is NULL,
|
* only when repl_backlog is not NULL. If the repl_backlog is NULL,
|
||||||
* it means that the instance isn't in any replication chains. In this
|
* it means that the instance isn't in any replication chains. In this
|
||||||
* scenario the replication info is useless, because when a slave
|
* scenario the replication info is useless, because when a slave
|
||||||
* connect to us, the NULL repl_backlog will trigger a full synchronization,
|
* connects to us, the NULL repl_backlog will trigger a full
|
||||||
* at the same time we will use a new replid and clear replid2.
|
* synchronization, at the same time we will use a new replid and clear
|
||||||
* And remember that after free backlog if we reach repl_backlog_time_limit,
|
* replid2. */
|
||||||
* we will use a new replid and clear replid2 too. So there is only one
|
|
||||||
* scenario which can make repl_stream_db be -1, that is the instance is
|
|
||||||
* a master, and it have repl_backlog, but server.slaveseldb is -1. */
|
|
||||||
if (!server.masterhost && server.repl_backlog) {
|
if (!server.masterhost && server.repl_backlog) {
|
||||||
rsi->repl_stream_db = server.slaveseldb == -1 ? 0 : server.slaveseldb;
|
|
||||||
/* Note that when server.slaveseldb is -1, it means that this master
|
/* Note that when server.slaveseldb is -1, it means that this master
|
||||||
* didn't apply any write commands after a full synchronization.
|
* didn't apply any write commands after a full synchronization.
|
||||||
* So we can let repl_stream_db be 0, this allows a restarted slave
|
* So we can let repl_stream_db be 0, this allows a restarted slave
|
||||||
* to reload replication ID/offset, it's safe because the next write
|
* to reload replication ID/offset, it's safe because the next write
|
||||||
* command must generate a SELECT statement. */
|
* command must generate a SELECT statement. */
|
||||||
|
rsi->repl_stream_db = server.slaveseldb == -1 ? 0 : server.slaveseldb;
|
||||||
return rsi;
|
return rsi;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -2061,16 +2058,12 @@ rdbSaveInfo *rdbPopulateSaveInfo(rdbSaveInfo *rsi) {
|
|||||||
rsi->repl_stream_db = server.master->db->id;
|
rsi->repl_stream_db = server.master->db->id;
|
||||||
return rsi;
|
return rsi;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
/* It is useful to persist cached_master's db id inside RDB file.
|
|
||||||
* When a slave lost master's connection, server.master will be
|
/* If we have a cached master we can use it in order to populate the
|
||||||
* cached as server.cached_master, after that a slave can not
|
* replication selected DB info inside the RDB file: the slave can
|
||||||
* increment the master_repl_offset because slave only apply data
|
* increment the master_repl_offset only from data arriving from the
|
||||||
* from connected master, so the cached_master can hold right
|
* master, so if we are disconnected the offset in the cached master
|
||||||
* replication info. But please note that this action is safe
|
* is valid. */
|
||||||
* only after we fix the free backlog problem, because when a master
|
|
||||||
* turn to be a slave, it will use itself as the server.cached_master,
|
|
||||||
* that is dangerous if we didn't use a new replication ID after
|
|
||||||
* free backlog. */
|
|
||||||
if (server.cached_master) {
|
if (server.cached_master) {
|
||||||
rsi->repl_stream_db = server.cached_master->db->id;
|
rsi->repl_stream_db = server.cached_master->db->id;
|
||||||
return rsi;
|
return rsi;
|
||||||
|
@ -2614,15 +2614,20 @@ void replicationCron(void) {
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
if (idle > server.repl_backlog_time_limit) {
|
if (idle > server.repl_backlog_time_limit) {
|
||||||
/* When we free the backlog, we always use a new
|
/* When we free the backlog, we always use a new
|
||||||
* replication ID and clear the ID2. Since without
|
* replication ID and clear the ID2. This is needed
|
||||||
* backlog we can not increment master_repl_offset
|
* because when there is no backlog, the master_repl_offset
|
||||||
* even do write commands, that may lead to inconsistency
|
* is not updated, but we would still retain our replication
|
||||||
* when we try to connect a "slave-before" master
|
* ID, leading to the following problem:
|
||||||
* (if this master is our slave before, our replid
|
*
|
||||||
* equals the master's replid2). As the master have our
|
* 1. We are a master instance.
|
||||||
* history, so we can match the master's replid2 and
|
* 2. Our slave is promoted to master. It's repl-id-2 will
|
||||||
* second_replid_offset, that make partial sync work,
|
* be the same as our repl-id.
|
||||||
* but the data is inconsistent. */
|
* 3. We, yet as master, receive some updates, that will not
|
||||||
|
* increment the master_repl_offset.
|
||||||
|
* 4. Later we are turned into a slave, connecto to the new
|
||||||
|
* master that will accept our PSYNC request by second
|
||||||
|
* replication ID, but there will be data inconsistency
|
||||||
|
* because we received writes. */
|
||||||
changeReplicationId();
|
changeReplicationId();
|
||||||
clearReplicationId2();
|
clearReplicationId2();
|
||||||
freeReplicationBacklog();
|
freeReplicationBacklog();
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user