redict/src/multi.c

426 lines
15 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (c) 2009-2012, Salvatore Sanfilippo <antirez at gmail dot com>
* All rights reserved.
*
* Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
* modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
*
* * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
* this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
* * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
* notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
* documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
* * Neither the name of Redis nor the names of its contributors may be used
* to endorse or promote products derived from this software without
* specific prior written permission.
*
* THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
* AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
* IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
* ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
* LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
* CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
* SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
* INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
* CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
* ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
* POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
#include "server.h"
/* ================================ MULTI/EXEC ============================== */
/* Client state initialization for MULTI/EXEC */
void initClientMultiState(client *c) {
c->mstate.commands = NULL;
c->mstate.count = 0;
c->mstate.cmd_flags = 0;
c->mstate.cmd_inv_flags = 0;
}
/* Release all the resources associated with MULTI/EXEC state */
void freeClientMultiState(client *c) {
int j;
for (j = 0; j < c->mstate.count; j++) {
int i;
multiCmd *mc = c->mstate.commands+j;
for (i = 0; i < mc->argc; i++)
decrRefCount(mc->argv[i]);
zfree(mc->argv);
}
zfree(c->mstate.commands);
}
/* Add a new command into the MULTI commands queue */
void queueMultiCommand(client *c) {
multiCmd *mc;
int j;
/* No sense to waste memory if the transaction is already aborted.
* this is useful in case client sends these in a pipeline, or doesn't
* bother to read previous responses and didn't notice the multi was already
* aborted. */
if (c->flags & CLIENT_DIRTY_EXEC)
return;
c->mstate.commands = zrealloc(c->mstate.commands,
sizeof(multiCmd)*(c->mstate.count+1));
mc = c->mstate.commands+c->mstate.count;
mc->cmd = c->cmd;
mc->argc = c->argc;
mc->argv = zmalloc(sizeof(robj*)*c->argc);
memcpy(mc->argv,c->argv,sizeof(robj*)*c->argc);
for (j = 0; j < c->argc; j++)
incrRefCount(mc->argv[j]);
c->mstate.count++;
c->mstate.cmd_flags |= c->cmd->flags;
c->mstate.cmd_inv_flags |= ~c->cmd->flags;
}
void discardTransaction(client *c) {
freeClientMultiState(c);
initClientMultiState(c);
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
c->flags &= ~(CLIENT_MULTI|CLIENT_DIRTY_CAS|CLIENT_DIRTY_EXEC);
unwatchAllKeys(c);
}
Squash merging 125 typo/grammar/comment/doc PRs (#7773) List of squashed commits or PRs =============================== commit 66801ea Author: hwware <wen.hui.ware@gmail.com> Date: Mon Jan 13 00:54:31 2020 -0500 typo fix in acl.c commit 46f55db Author: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com> Date: Sun Sep 6 18:24:11 2020 +0300 Updates a couple of comments Specifically: * RM_AutoMemory completed instead of pointing to docs * Updated link to custom type doc commit 61a2aa0 Author: xindoo <xindoo@qq.com> Date: Tue Sep 1 19:24:59 2020 +0800 Correct errors in code comments commit a5871d1 Author: yz1509 <pro-756@qq.com> Date: Tue Sep 1 18:36:06 2020 +0800 fix typos in module.c commit 41eede7 Author: bookug <bookug@qq.com> Date: Sat Aug 15 01:11:33 2020 +0800 docs: fix typos in comments commit c303c84 Author: lazy-snail <ws.niu@outlook.com> Date: Fri Aug 7 11:15:44 2020 +0800 fix spelling in redis.conf commit 1eb76bf Author: zhujian <zhujianxyz@gmail.com> Date: Thu Aug 6 15:22:10 2020 +0800 add a missing 'n' in comment commit 1530ec2 Author: Daniel Dai <764122422@qq.com> Date: Mon Jul 27 00:46:35 2020 -0400 fix spelling in tracking.c commit e517b31 Author: Hunter-Chen <huntcool001@gmail.com> Date: Fri Jul 17 22:33:32 2020 +0800 Update redis.conf Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com> commit c300eff Author: Hunter-Chen <huntcool001@gmail.com> Date: Fri Jul 17 22:33:23 2020 +0800 Update redis.conf Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com> commit 4c058a8 Author: 陈浩鹏 <chenhaopeng@heytea.com> Date: Thu Jun 25 19:00:56 2020 +0800 Grammar fix and clarification commit 5fcaa81 Author: bodong.ybd <bodong.ybd@alibaba-inc.com> Date: Fri Jun 19 10:09:00 2020 +0800 Fix typos commit 4caca9a Author: Pruthvi P <pruthvi@ixigo.com> Date: Fri May 22 00:33:22 2020 +0530 Fix typo eviciton => eviction commit b2a25f6 Author: Brad Dunbar <dunbarb2@gmail.com> Date: Sun May 17 12:39:59 2020 -0400 Fix a typo. commit 12842ae Author: hwware <wen.hui.ware@gmail.com> Date: Sun May 3 17:16:59 2020 -0400 fix spelling in redis conf commit ddba07c Author: Chris Lamb <chris@chris-lamb.co.uk> Date: Sat May 2 23:25:34 2020 +0100 Correct a "conflicts" spelling error. commit 8fc7bf2 Author: Nao YONASHIRO <yonashiro@r.recruit.co.jp> Date: Thu Apr 30 10:25:27 2020 +0900 docs: fix EXPIRE_FAST_CYCLE_DURATION to ACTIVE_EXPIRE_CYCLE_FAST_DURATION commit 9b2b67a Author: Brad Dunbar <dunbarb2@gmail.com> Date: Fri Apr 24 11:46:22 2020 -0400 Fix a typo. commit 0746f10 Author: devilinrust <63737265+devilinrust@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu Apr 16 00:17:53 2020 +0200 Fix typos in server.c commit 92b588d Author: benjessop12 <56115861+benjessop12@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Mon Apr 13 13:43:55 2020 +0100 Fix spelling mistake in lazyfree.c commit 1da37aa Merge: 2d4ba28 af347a8 Author: hwware <wen.hui.ware@gmail.com> Date: Thu Mar 5 22:41:31 2020 -0500 Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/unstable' into expiretypofix commit 2d4ba28 Author: hwware <wen.hui.ware@gmail.com> Date: Mon Mar 2 00:09:40 2020 -0500 fix typo in expire.c commit 1a746f7 Author: SennoYuki <minakami1yuki@gmail.com> Date: Thu Feb 27 16:54:32 2020 +0800 fix typo commit 8599b1a Author: dongheejeong <donghee950403@gmail.com> Date: Sun Feb 16 20:31:43 2020 +0000 Fix typo in server.c commit f38d4e8 Author: hwware <wen.hui.ware@gmail.com> Date: Sun Feb 2 22:58:38 2020 -0500 fix typo in evict.c commit fe143fc Author: Leo Murillo <leonardo.murillo@gmail.com> Date: Sun Feb 2 01:57:22 2020 -0600 Fix a few typos in redis.conf commit 1ab4d21 Author: viraja1 <anchan.viraj@gmail.com> Date: Fri Dec 27 17:15:58 2019 +0530 Fix typo in Latency API docstring commit ca1f70e Author: gosth <danxuedexing@qq.com> Date: Wed Dec 18 15:18:02 2019 +0800 fix typo in sort.c commit a57c06b Author: ZYunH <zyunhjob@163.com> Date: Mon Dec 16 22:28:46 2019 +0800 fix-zset-typo commit b8c92b5 Author: git-hulk <hulk.website@gmail.com> Date: Mon Dec 16 15:51:42 2019 +0800 FIX: typo in cluster.c, onformation->information commit 9dd981c Author: wujm2007 <jim.wujm@gmail.com> Date: Mon Dec 16 09:37:52 2019 +0800 Fix typo commit e132d7a Author: Sebastien Williams-Wynn <s.williamswynn.mail@gmail.com> Date: Fri Nov 15 00:14:07 2019 +0000 Minor typo change commit 47f44d5 Author: happynote3966 <01ssrmikururudevice01@gmail.com> Date: Mon Nov 11 22:08:48 2019 +0900 fix comment typo in redis-cli.c commit b8bdb0d Author: fulei <fulei@kuaishou.com> Date: Wed Oct 16 18:00:17 2019 +0800 Fix a spelling mistake of comments in defragDictBucketCallback commit 0def46a Author: fulei <fulei@kuaishou.com> Date: Wed Oct 16 13:09:27 2019 +0800 fix some spelling mistakes of comments in defrag.c commit f3596fd Author: Phil Rajchgot <tophil@outlook.com> Date: Sun Oct 13 02:02:32 2019 -0400 Typo and grammar fixes Redis and its documentation are great -- just wanted to submit a few corrections in the spirit of Hacktoberfest. Thanks for all your work on this project. I use it all the time and it works beautifully. commit 2b928cd Author: KangZhiDong <worldkzd@gmail.com> Date: Sun Sep 1 07:03:11 2019 +0800 fix typos commit 33aea14 Author: Axlgrep <axlgrep@gmail.com> Date: Tue Aug 27 11:02:18 2019 +0800 Fixed eviction spelling issues commit e282a80 Author: Simen Flatby <simen@oms.no> Date: Tue Aug 20 15:25:51 2019 +0200 Update comments to reflect prop name In the comments the prop is referenced as replica-validity-factor, but it is really named cluster-replica-validity-factor. commit 74d1f9a Author: Jim Green <jimgreen2013@qq.com> Date: Tue Aug 20 20:00:31 2019 +0800 fix comment error, the code is ok commit eea1407 Author: Liao Tonglang <liaotonglang@gmail.com> Date: Fri May 31 10:16:18 2019 +0800 typo fix fix cna't to can't commit 0da553c Author: KAWACHI Takashi <tkawachi@gmail.com> Date: Wed Jul 17 00:38:16 2019 +0900 Fix typo commit 7fc8fb6 Author: Michael Prokop <mika@grml.org> Date: Tue May 28 17:58:42 2019 +0200 Typo fixes s/familar/familiar/ s/compatiblity/compatibility/ s/ ot / to / s/itsef/itself/ commit 5f46c9d Author: zhumoing <34539422+zhumoing@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue May 21 21:16:50 2019 +0800 typo-fixes typo-fixes commit 321dfe1 Author: wxisme <850885154@qq.com> Date: Sat Mar 16 15:10:55 2019 +0800 typo fix commit b4fb131 Merge: 267e0e6 3df1eb8 Author: Nikitas Bastas <nikitasbst@gmail.com> Date: Fri Feb 8 22:55:45 2019 +0200 Merge branch 'unstable' of antirez/redis into unstable commit 267e0e6 Author: Nikitas Bastas <nikitasbst@gmail.com> Date: Wed Jan 30 21:26:04 2019 +0200 Minor typo fix commit 30544e7 Author: inshal96 <39904558+inshal96@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Fri Jan 4 16:54:50 2019 +0500 remove an extra 'a' in the comments commit 337969d Author: BrotherGao <yangdongheng11@gmail.com> Date: Sat Dec 29 12:37:29 2018 +0800 fix typo in redis.conf commit 9f4b121 Merge: 423a030 e504583 Author: BrotherGao <yangdongheng@xiaomi.com> Date: Sat Dec 29 11:41:12 2018 +0800 Merge branch 'unstable' of antirez/redis into unstable commit 423a030 Merge: 42b02b7 46a51cd Author: 杨东衡 <yangdongheng@xiaomi.com> Date: Tue Dec 4 23:56:11 2018 +0800 Merge branch 'unstable' of antirez/redis into unstable commit 42b02b7 Merge: 68c0e6e b8febe6 Author: Dongheng Yang <yangdongheng11@gmail.com> Date: Sun Oct 28 15:54:23 2018 +0800 Merge pull request #1 from antirez/unstable update local data commit 714b589 Author: Christian <crifei93@gmail.com> Date: Fri Dec 28 01:17:26 2018 +0100 fix typo "resulution" commit e23259d Author: garenchan <1412950785@qq.com> Date: Wed Dec 26 09:58:35 2018 +0800 fix typo: segfauls -> segfault commit a9359f8 Author: xjp <jianping_xie@aliyun.com> Date: Tue Dec 18 17:31:44 2018 +0800 Fixed REDISMODULE_H spell bug commit a12c3e4 Author: jdiaz <jrd.palacios@gmail.com> Date: Sat Dec 15 23:39:52 2018 -0600 Fixes hyperloglog hash function comment block description commit 770eb11 Author: 林上耀 <1210tom@163.com> Date: Sun Nov 25 17:16:10 2018 +0800 fix typo commit fd97fbb Author: Chris Lamb <chris@chris-lamb.co.uk> Date: Fri Nov 23 17:14:01 2018 +0100 Correct "unsupported" typo. commit a85522d Author: Jungnam Lee <jungnam.lee@oracle.com> Date: Thu Nov 8 23:01:29 2018 +0900 fix typo in test comments commit ade8007 Author: Arun Kumar <palerdot@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue Oct 23 16:56:35 2018 +0530 Fixed grammatical typo Fixed typo for word 'dictionary' commit 869ee39 Author: Hamid Alaei <hamid.a85@gmail.com> Date: Sun Aug 12 16:40:02 2018 +0430 fix documentations: (ThreadSafeContextStart/Stop -> ThreadSafeContextLock/Unlock), minor typo commit f89d158 Author: Mayank Jain <mayankjain255@gmail.com> Date: Tue Jul 31 23:01:21 2018 +0530 Updated README.md with some spelling corrections. Made correction in spelling of some misspelled words. commit 892198e Author: dsomeshwar <someshwar.dhayalan@gmail.com> Date: Sat Jul 21 23:23:04 2018 +0530 typo fix commit 8a4d780 Author: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com> Date: Mon Apr 30 02:06:52 2018 +0300 Fixes some typos commit e3acef6 Author: Noah Rosamilia <ivoahivoah@gmail.com> Date: Sat Mar 3 23:41:21 2018 -0500 Fix typo in /deps/README.md commit 04442fb Author: WuYunlong <xzsyeb@126.com> Date: Sat Mar 3 10:32:42 2018 +0800 Fix typo in readSyncBulkPayload() comment. commit 9f36880 Author: WuYunlong <xzsyeb@126.com> Date: Sat Mar 3 10:20:37 2018 +0800 replication.c comment: run_id -> replid. commit f866b4a Author: Francesco 'makevoid' Canessa <makevoid@gmail.com> Date: Thu Feb 22 22:01:56 2018 +0000 fix comment typo in server.c commit 0ebc69b Author: 줍 <jubee0124@gmail.com> Date: Mon Feb 12 16:38:48 2018 +0900 Fix typo in redis.conf Fix `five behaviors` to `eight behaviors` in [this sentence ](antirez/redis@unstable/redis.conf#L564) commit b50a620 Author: martinbroadhurst <martinbroadhurst@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Thu Dec 28 12:07:30 2017 +0000 Fix typo in valgrind.sup commit 7d8f349 Author: Peter Boughton <peter@sorcerersisle.com> Date: Mon Nov 27 19:52:19 2017 +0000 Update CONTRIBUTING; refer doc updates to redis-doc repo. commit 02dec7e Author: Klauswk <klauswk1@hotmail.com> Date: Tue Oct 24 16:18:38 2017 -0200 Fix typo in comment commit e1efbc8 Author: chenshi <baiwfg2@gmail.com> Date: Tue Oct 3 18:26:30 2017 +0800 Correct two spelling errors of comments commit 93327d8 Author: spacewander <spacewanderlzx@gmail.com> Date: Wed Sep 13 16:47:24 2017 +0800 Update the comment for OBJ_ENCODING_EMBSTR_SIZE_LIMIT's value The value of OBJ_ENCODING_EMBSTR_SIZE_LIMIT is 44 now instead of 39. commit 63d361f Author: spacewander <spacewanderlzx@gmail.com> Date: Tue Sep 12 15:06:42 2017 +0800 Fix <prevlen> related doc in ziplist.c According to the definition of ZIP_BIG_PREVLEN and other related code, the guard of single byte <prevlen> should be 254 instead of 255. commit ebe228d Author: hanael80 <hanael80@gmail.com> Date: Tue Aug 15 09:09:40 2017 +0900 Fix typo commit 6b696e6 Author: Matt Robenolt <matt@ydekproductions.com> Date: Mon Aug 14 14:50:47 2017 -0700 Fix typo in LATENCY DOCTOR output commit a2ec6ae Author: caosiyang <caosiyang@qiyi.com> Date: Tue Aug 15 14:15:16 2017 +0800 Fix a typo: form => from commit 3ab7699 Author: caosiyang <caosiyang@qiyi.com> Date: Thu Aug 10 18:40:33 2017 +0800 Fix a typo: replicationFeedSlavesFromMaster() => replicationFeedSlavesFromMasterStream() commit 72d43ef Author: caosiyang <caosiyang@qiyi.com> Date: Tue Aug 8 15:57:25 2017 +0800 fix a typo: servewr => server commit 707c958 Author: Bo Cai <charpty@gmail.com> Date: Wed Jul 26 21:49:42 2017 +0800 redis-cli.c typo: conut -> count. Signed-off-by: Bo Cai <charpty@gmail.com> commit b9385b2 Author: JackDrogon <jack.xsuperman@gmail.com> Date: Fri Jun 30 14:22:31 2017 +0800 Fix some spell problems commit 20d9230 Author: akosel <aaronjkosel@gmail.com> Date: Sun Jun 4 19:35:13 2017 -0500 Fix typo commit b167bfc Author: Krzysiek Witkowicz <krzysiekwitkowicz@gmail.com> Date: Mon May 22 21:32:27 2017 +0100 Fix #4008 small typo in comment commit 2b78ac8 Author: Jake Clarkson <jacobwclarkson@gmail.com> Date: Wed Apr 26 15:49:50 2017 +0100 Correct typo in tests/unit/hyperloglog.tcl commit b0f1cdb Author: Qi Luo <qiluo-msft@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed Apr 19 14:25:18 2017 -0700 Fix typo commit a90b0f9 Author: charsyam <charsyam@naver.com> Date: Thu Mar 16 18:19:53 2017 +0900 fix typos fix typos fix typos commit 8430a79 Author: Richard Hart <richardhart92@gmail.com> Date: Mon Mar 13 22:17:41 2017 -0400 Fixed log message typo in listenToPort. commit 481a1c2 Author: Vinod Kumar <kumar003vinod@gmail.com> Date: Sun Jan 15 23:04:51 2017 +0530 src/db.c: Correct "save" -> "safe" typo commit 586b4d3 Author: wangshaonan <wshn13@gmail.com> Date: Wed Dec 21 20:28:27 2016 +0800 Fix typo they->the in helloworld.c commit c1c4b5e Author: Jenner <hypxm@qq.com> Date: Mon Dec 19 16:39:46 2016 +0800 typo error commit 1ee1a3f Author: tielei <43289893@qq.com> Date: Mon Jul 18 13:52:25 2016 +0800 fix some comments commit 11a41fb Author: Otto Kekäläinen <otto@seravo.fi> Date: Sun Jul 3 10:23:55 2016 +0100 Fix spelling in documentation and comments commit 5fb5d82 Author: francischan <f1ancis621@gmail.com> Date: Tue Jun 28 00:19:33 2016 +0800 Fix outdated comments about redis.c file. It should now refer to server.c file. commit 6b254bc Author: lmatt-bit <lmatt123n@gmail.com> Date: Thu Apr 21 21:45:58 2016 +0800 Refine the comment of dictRehashMilliseconds func SLAVECONF->REPLCONF in comment - by andyli029 commit ee9869f Author: clark.kang <charsyam@naver.com> Date: Tue Mar 22 11:09:51 2016 +0900 fix typos commit f7b3b11 Author: Harisankar H <harisankarh@gmail.com> Date: Wed Mar 9 11:49:42 2016 +0530 Typo correction: "faield" --> "failed" Typo correction: "faield" --> "failed" commit 3fd40fc Author: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com> Date: Thu Feb 25 10:31:51 2016 +0200 Fixes a typo in comments commit 621c160 Author: Prayag Verma <prayag.verma@gmail.com> Date: Mon Feb 1 12:36:20 2016 +0530 Fix typo in Readme.md Spelling mistakes - `eviciton` > `eviction` `familar` > `familiar` commit d7d07d6 Author: WonCheol Lee <toctoc21c@gmail.com> Date: Wed Dec 30 15:11:34 2015 +0900 Typo fixed commit a4dade7 Author: Felix Bünemann <buenemann@louis.info> Date: Mon Dec 28 11:02:55 2015 +0100 [ci skip] Improve supervised upstart config docs This mentions that "expect stop" is required for supervised upstart to work correctly. See http://upstart.ubuntu.com/cookbook/#expect-stop for an explanation. commit d9caba9 Author: daurnimator <quae@daurnimator.com> Date: Mon Dec 21 18:30:03 2015 +1100 README: Remove trailing whitespace commit 72d42e5 Author: daurnimator <quae@daurnimator.com> Date: Mon Dec 21 18:29:32 2015 +1100 README: Fix typo. th => the commit dd6e957 Author: daurnimator <quae@daurnimator.com> Date: Mon Dec 21 18:29:20 2015 +1100 README: Fix typo. familar => familiar commit 3a12b23 Author: daurnimator <quae@daurnimator.com> Date: Mon Dec 21 18:28:54 2015 +1100 README: Fix typo. eviciton => eviction commit 2d1d03b Author: daurnimator <quae@daurnimator.com> Date: Mon Dec 21 18:21:45 2015 +1100 README: Fix typo. sever => server commit 3973b06 Author: Itamar Haber <itamar@garantiadata.com> Date: Sat Dec 19 17:01:20 2015 +0200 Typo fix commit 4f2e460 Author: Steve Gao <fu@2token.com> Date: Fri Dec 4 10:22:05 2015 +0800 Update README - fix typos commit b21667c Author: binyan <binbin.yan@nokia.com> Date: Wed Dec 2 22:48:37 2015 +0800 delete redundancy color judge in sdscatcolor commit 88894c7 Author: binyan <binbin.yan@nokia.com> Date: Wed Dec 2 22:14:42 2015 +0800 the example output shoule be HelloWorld commit 2763470 Author: binyan <binbin.yan@nokia.com> Date: Wed Dec 2 17:41:39 2015 +0800 modify error word keyevente Signed-off-by: binyan <binbin.yan@nokia.com> commit 0847b3d Author: Bruno Martins <bscmartins@gmail.com> Date: Wed Nov 4 11:37:01 2015 +0000 typo commit bbb9e9e Author: dawedawe <dawedawe@gmx.de> Date: Fri Mar 27 00:46:41 2015 +0100 typo: zimap -> zipmap commit 5ed297e Author: Axel Advento <badwolf.bloodseeker.rev@gmail.com> Date: Tue Mar 3 15:58:29 2015 +0800 Fix 'salve' typos to 'slave' commit edec9d6 Author: LudwikJaniuk <ludvig.janiuk@gmail.com> Date: Wed Jun 12 14:12:47 2019 +0200 Update README.md Co-Authored-By: Qix <Qix-@users.noreply.github.com> commit 692a7af Author: LudwikJaniuk <ludvig.janiuk@gmail.com> Date: Tue May 28 14:32:04 2019 +0200 grammar commit d962b0a Author: Nick Frost <nickfrostatx@gmail.com> Date: Wed Jul 20 15:17:12 2016 -0700 Minor grammar fix commit 24fff01aaccaf5956973ada8c50ceb1462e211c6 (typos) Author: Chad Miller <chadm@squareup.com> Date: Tue Sep 8 13:46:11 2020 -0400 Fix faulty comment about operation of unlink() commit 3cd5c1f3326c52aa552ada7ec797c6bb16452355 Author: Kevin <kevin.xgr@gmail.com> Date: Wed Nov 20 00:13:50 2019 +0800 Fix typo in server.c. From a83af59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: wuwo <wuwo@wacai.com> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2017 20:37:45 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] falure to failure From c961896 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?=E5=B7=A6=E6=87=B6?= <veficos@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 27 May 2017 15:33:04 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] fix typo From e600ef2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "rui.zou" <rui.zou@yunify.com> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 12:38:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] fix a typo From c7d07fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexandre Perrin <alex@kaworu.ch> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 10:35:31 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] deps README.md typo From b25cb67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guy Korland <gkorland@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 10:55:37 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] fix typos in header From ad28ca6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Guy Korland <gkorland@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2018 11:02:36 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] fix typos commit 34924cdedd8552466fc22c1168d49236cb7ee915 Author: Adrian Lynch <adi_ady_ade@hotmail.com> Date: Sat Apr 4 21:59:15 2015 +0100 Typos fixed commit fd2a1e7 Author: Jan <jsteemann@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Sat Oct 27 19:13:01 2018 +0200 Fix typos Fix typos commit e14e47c1a234b53b0e103c5f6a1c61481cbcbb02 Author: Andy Lester <andy@petdance.com> Date: Fri Aug 2 22:30:07 2019 -0500 Fix multiple misspellings of "following" commit 79b948ce2dac6b453fe80995abbcaac04c213d5a Author: Andy Lester <andy@petdance.com> Date: Fri Aug 2 22:24:28 2019 -0500 Fix misspelling of create-cluster commit 1fffde52666dc99ab35efbd31071a4c008cb5a71 Author: Andy Lester <andy@petdance.com> Date: Wed Jul 31 17:57:56 2019 -0500 Fix typos commit 204c9ba9651e9e05fd73936b452b9a30be456cfe Author: Xiaobo Zhu <xiaobo.zhu@shopee.com> Date: Tue Aug 13 22:19:25 2019 +0800 fix typos Squashed commit of the following: commit 1d9aaf8 Author: danmedani <danmedani@gmail.com> Date: Sun Aug 2 11:40:26 2015 -0700 README typo fix. Squashed commit of the following: commit 32bfa7c Author: Erik Dubbelboer <erik@dubbelboer.com> Date: Mon Jul 6 21:15:08 2015 +0200 Fixed grammer Squashed commit of the following: commit b24f69c Author: Sisir Koppaka <sisir.koppaka@gmail.com> Date: Mon Mar 2 22:38:45 2015 -0500 utils/hashtable/rehashing.c: Fix typos Squashed commit of the following: commit 4e04082 Author: Erik Dubbelboer <erik@dubbelboer.com> Date: Mon Mar 23 08:22:21 2015 +0000 Small config file documentation improvements Squashed commit of the following: commit acb8773 Author: ctd1500 <ctd1500@gmail.com> Date: Fri May 8 01:52:48 2015 -0700 Typo and grammar fixes in readme commit 2eb75b6 Author: ctd1500 <ctd1500@gmail.com> Date: Fri May 8 01:36:18 2015 -0700 fixed redis.conf comment Squashed commit of the following: commit a8249a2 Author: Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com> Date: Fri Dec 11 11:39:52 2015 +0530 Revise correction of typos. Squashed commit of the following: commit 3c02028 Author: zhaojun11 <zhaojun11@jd.com> Date: Wed Jan 17 19:05:28 2018 +0800 Fix typos include two code typos in cluster.c and latency.c Squashed commit of the following: commit 9dba47c Author: q191201771 <191201771@qq.com> Date: Sat Jan 4 11:31:04 2020 +0800 fix function listCreate comment in adlist.c Update src/server.c commit 2c7c2cb536e78dd211b1ac6f7bda00f0f54faaeb Author: charpty <charpty@gmail.com> Date: Tue May 1 23:16:59 2018 +0800 server.c typo: modules system dictionary type comment Signed-off-by: charpty <charpty@gmail.com> commit a8395323fb63cb59cb3591cb0f0c8edb7c29a680 Author: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com> Date: Sun May 6 00:25:18 2018 +0300 Updates test_helper.tcl's help with undocumented options Specifically: * Host * Port * Client commit bde6f9ced15755cd6407b4af7d601b030f36d60b Author: wxisme <850885154@qq.com> Date: Wed Aug 8 15:19:19 2018 +0800 fix comments in deps files commit 3172474ba991532ab799ee1873439f3402412331 Author: wxisme <850885154@qq.com> Date: Wed Aug 8 14:33:49 2018 +0800 fix some comments commit 01b6f2b6858b5cf2ce4ad5092d2c746e755f53f0 Author: Thor Juhasz <thor@juhasz.pro> Date: Sun Nov 18 14:37:41 2018 +0100 Minor fixes to comments Found some parts a little unclear on a first read, which prompted me to have a better look at the file and fix some minor things I noticed. Fixing minor typos and grammar. There are no changes to configuration options. These changes are only meant to help the user better understand the explanations to the various configuration options
2020-09-10 13:43:38 +03:00
/* Flag the transaction as DIRTY_EXEC so that EXEC will fail.
* Should be called every time there is an error while queueing a command. */
void flagTransaction(client *c) {
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
if (c->flags & CLIENT_MULTI)
c->flags |= CLIENT_DIRTY_EXEC;
}
void multiCommand(client *c) {
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
if (c->flags & CLIENT_MULTI) {
addReplyError(c,"MULTI calls can not be nested");
return;
}
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
c->flags |= CLIENT_MULTI;
Unified MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call with respect to blocking commands (#8025) Blocking command should not be used with MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call. This is because, the caller, who executes the command in this context, expects a reply. Today, LUA and MULTI have a special (and different) treatment to blocking commands: LUA - Most commands are marked with no-script flag which are checked when executing and command from LUA, commands that are not marked (like XREAD) verify that their blocking mode is not used inside LUA (by checking the CLIENT_LUA client flag). MULTI - Command that is going to block, first verify that the client is not inside multi (by checking the CLIENT_MULTI client flag). If the client is inside multi, they return a result which is a match to the empty key with no timeout (for example blpop inside MULTI will act as lpop) For modules that perform RM_Call with blocking command, the returned results type is REDISMODULE_REPLY_UNKNOWN and the caller can not really know what happened. Disadvantages of the current state are: No unified approach, LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call, each has a different treatment Module can not safely execute blocking command (and get reply or error). Though It is true that modules are not like LUA or MULTI and should be smarter not to execute blocking commands on RM_Call, sometimes you want to execute a command base on client input (for example if you create a module that provides a new scripting language like javascript or python). While modules (on modules command) can check for REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_LUA or REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_MULTI to know not to block the client, there is no way to check if the command came from another module using RM_Call. So there is no way for a module to know not to block another module RM_Call execution. This commit adds a way to unify the treatment for blocking clients by introducing a new CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING client flag. On LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call the new flag turned on to signify that the client should not be blocked. A blocking command verifies that the flag is turned off before blocking. If a blocking command sees that the CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag is on, it's not blocking and return results which are matches to empty key with no timeout (as MULTI does today). The new flag is checked on the following commands: List blocking commands: BLPOP, BRPOP, BRPOPLPUSH, BLMOVE, Zset blocking commands: BZPOPMIN, BZPOPMAX Stream blocking commands: XREAD, XREADGROUP SUBSCRIBE, PSUBSCRIBE, MONITOR In addition, the new flag is turned on inside the AOF client, we do not want to block the AOF client to prevent deadlocks and commands ordering issues (and there is also an existing assert in the code that verifies it). To keep backward compatibility on LUA, all the no-script flags on existing commands were kept untouched. In addition, a LUA special treatment on XREAD and XREADGROUP was kept. To keep backward compatibility on MULTI (which today allows SUBSCRIBE, and PSUBSCRIBE). We added a special treatment on those commands to allow executing them on MULTI. The only backward compatibility issue that this PR introduces is that now MONITOR is not allowed inside MULTI. Tests were added to verify blocking commands are not blocking the client on LUA, MULTI, or RM_Call. Tests were added to verify the module can check for CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag. Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com> Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com>
2020-11-17 18:58:55 +02:00
addReply(c,shared.ok);
}
void discardCommand(client *c) {
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
if (!(c->flags & CLIENT_MULTI)) {
addReplyError(c,"DISCARD without MULTI");
return;
}
discardTransaction(c);
addReply(c,shared.ok);
}
Fix some issues with modules and MULTI/EXEC (#8617) Bug 1: When a module ctx is freed moduleHandlePropagationAfterCommandCallback is called and handles propagation. We want to prevent it from propagating commands that were not replicated by the same context. Example: 1. module1.foo does: RM_Replicate(cmd1); RM_Call(cmd2); RM_Replicate(cmd3) 2. RM_Replicate(cmd1) propagates MULTI and adds cmd1 to also_propagagte 3. RM_Call(cmd2) create a new ctx, calls call() and destroys the ctx. 4. moduleHandlePropagationAfterCommandCallback is called, calling alsoPropagates EXEC (Note: EXEC is still not written to socket), setting server.in_trnsaction = 0 5. RM_Replicate(cmd3) is called, propagagting yet another MULTI (now we have nested MULTI calls, which is no good) and then cmd3 We must prevent RM_Call(cmd2) from resetting server.in_transaction. REDISMODULE_CTX_MULTI_EMITTED was revived for that purpose. Bug 2: Fix issues with nested RM_Call where some have '!' and some don't. Example: 1. module1.foo does RM_Call of module2.bar without replication (i.e. no '!') 2. module2.bar internally calls RM_Call of INCR with '!' 3. at the end of module1.foo we call RM_ReplicateVerbatim We want the replica/AOF to see only module1.foo and not the INCR from module2.bar Introduced a global replication_allowed flag inside RM_Call to determine whether we need to replicate or not (even if '!' was specified) Other changes: Split beforePropagateMultiOrExec to beforePropagateMulti afterPropagateExec just for better readability
2021-03-10 17:02:17 +01:00
void beforePropagateMulti() {
/* Propagating MULTI */
serverAssert(!server.propagate_in_transaction);
server.propagate_in_transaction = 1;
}
void afterPropagateExec() {
/* Propagating EXEC */
serverAssert(server.propagate_in_transaction == 1);
server.propagate_in_transaction = 0;
}
/* Send a MULTI command to all the slaves and AOF file. Check the execCommand
2013-01-17 01:00:20 +08:00
* implementation for more information. */
Remove read-only flag from non-keyspace cmds, different approach for EXEC to propagate MULTI (#8216) In the distant history there was only the read flag for commands, and whatever command that didn't have the read flag was a write one. Then we added the write flag, but some portions of the code still used !read Also some commands that don't work on the keyspace at all, still have the read flag. Changes in this commit: 1. remove the read-only flag from TIME, ECHO, ROLE and LASTSAVE 2. EXEC command used to decides if it should propagate a MULTI by looking at the command flags (!read & !admin). When i was about to change it to look at the write flag instead, i realized that this would cause it not to propagate a MULTI for PUBLISH, EVAL, and SCRIPT, all 3 are not marked as either a read command or a write one (as they should), but all 3 are calling forceCommandPropagation. So instead of introducing a new flag to denote a command that "writes" but not into the keyspace, and still needs propagation, i decided to rely on the forceCommandPropagation, and just fix the code to propagate MULTI when needed rather than depending on the command flags at all. The implication of my change then is that now it won't decide to propagate MULTI when it sees one of these: SELECT, PING, INFO, COMMAND, TIME and other commands which are neither read nor write. 3. Changing getNodeByQuery and clusterRedirectBlockedClientIfNeeded in cluster.c to look at !write rather than read flag. This should have no implications, since these code paths are only reachable for commands which access keys, and these are always marked as either read or write. This commit improve MULTI propagation tests, for modules and a bunch of other special cases, all of which used to pass already before that commit. the only one that test change that uncovered a change of behavior is the one that DELs a non-existing key, it used to propagate an empty multi-exec block, and no longer does.
2020-12-22 12:03:49 +02:00
void execCommandPropagateMulti(int dbid) {
Fix some issues with modules and MULTI/EXEC (#8617) Bug 1: When a module ctx is freed moduleHandlePropagationAfterCommandCallback is called and handles propagation. We want to prevent it from propagating commands that were not replicated by the same context. Example: 1. module1.foo does: RM_Replicate(cmd1); RM_Call(cmd2); RM_Replicate(cmd3) 2. RM_Replicate(cmd1) propagates MULTI and adds cmd1 to also_propagagte 3. RM_Call(cmd2) create a new ctx, calls call() and destroys the ctx. 4. moduleHandlePropagationAfterCommandCallback is called, calling alsoPropagates EXEC (Note: EXEC is still not written to socket), setting server.in_trnsaction = 0 5. RM_Replicate(cmd3) is called, propagagting yet another MULTI (now we have nested MULTI calls, which is no good) and then cmd3 We must prevent RM_Call(cmd2) from resetting server.in_transaction. REDISMODULE_CTX_MULTI_EMITTED was revived for that purpose. Bug 2: Fix issues with nested RM_Call where some have '!' and some don't. Example: 1. module1.foo does RM_Call of module2.bar without replication (i.e. no '!') 2. module2.bar internally calls RM_Call of INCR with '!' 3. at the end of module1.foo we call RM_ReplicateVerbatim We want the replica/AOF to see only module1.foo and not the INCR from module2.bar Introduced a global replication_allowed flag inside RM_Call to determine whether we need to replicate or not (even if '!' was specified) Other changes: Split beforePropagateMultiOrExec to beforePropagateMulti afterPropagateExec just for better readability
2021-03-10 17:02:17 +01:00
beforePropagateMulti();
Remove read-only flag from non-keyspace cmds, different approach for EXEC to propagate MULTI (#8216) In the distant history there was only the read flag for commands, and whatever command that didn't have the read flag was a write one. Then we added the write flag, but some portions of the code still used !read Also some commands that don't work on the keyspace at all, still have the read flag. Changes in this commit: 1. remove the read-only flag from TIME, ECHO, ROLE and LASTSAVE 2. EXEC command used to decides if it should propagate a MULTI by looking at the command flags (!read & !admin). When i was about to change it to look at the write flag instead, i realized that this would cause it not to propagate a MULTI for PUBLISH, EVAL, and SCRIPT, all 3 are not marked as either a read command or a write one (as they should), but all 3 are calling forceCommandPropagation. So instead of introducing a new flag to denote a command that "writes" but not into the keyspace, and still needs propagation, i decided to rely on the forceCommandPropagation, and just fix the code to propagate MULTI when needed rather than depending on the command flags at all. The implication of my change then is that now it won't decide to propagate MULTI when it sees one of these: SELECT, PING, INFO, COMMAND, TIME and other commands which are neither read nor write. 3. Changing getNodeByQuery and clusterRedirectBlockedClientIfNeeded in cluster.c to look at !write rather than read flag. This should have no implications, since these code paths are only reachable for commands which access keys, and these are always marked as either read or write. This commit improve MULTI propagation tests, for modules and a bunch of other special cases, all of which used to pass already before that commit. the only one that test change that uncovered a change of behavior is the one that DELs a non-existing key, it used to propagate an empty multi-exec block, and no longer does.
2020-12-22 12:03:49 +02:00
propagate(server.multiCommand,dbid,&shared.multi,1,
PROPAGATE_AOF|PROPAGATE_REPL);
}
Remove read-only flag from non-keyspace cmds, different approach for EXEC to propagate MULTI (#8216) In the distant history there was only the read flag for commands, and whatever command that didn't have the read flag was a write one. Then we added the write flag, but some portions of the code still used !read Also some commands that don't work on the keyspace at all, still have the read flag. Changes in this commit: 1. remove the read-only flag from TIME, ECHO, ROLE and LASTSAVE 2. EXEC command used to decides if it should propagate a MULTI by looking at the command flags (!read & !admin). When i was about to change it to look at the write flag instead, i realized that this would cause it not to propagate a MULTI for PUBLISH, EVAL, and SCRIPT, all 3 are not marked as either a read command or a write one (as they should), but all 3 are calling forceCommandPropagation. So instead of introducing a new flag to denote a command that "writes" but not into the keyspace, and still needs propagation, i decided to rely on the forceCommandPropagation, and just fix the code to propagate MULTI when needed rather than depending on the command flags at all. The implication of my change then is that now it won't decide to propagate MULTI when it sees one of these: SELECT, PING, INFO, COMMAND, TIME and other commands which are neither read nor write. 3. Changing getNodeByQuery and clusterRedirectBlockedClientIfNeeded in cluster.c to look at !write rather than read flag. This should have no implications, since these code paths are only reachable for commands which access keys, and these are always marked as either read or write. This commit improve MULTI propagation tests, for modules and a bunch of other special cases, all of which used to pass already before that commit. the only one that test change that uncovered a change of behavior is the one that DELs a non-existing key, it used to propagate an empty multi-exec block, and no longer does.
2020-12-22 12:03:49 +02:00
void execCommandPropagateExec(int dbid) {
propagate(server.execCommand,dbid,&shared.exec,1,
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
PROPAGATE_AOF|PROPAGATE_REPL);
Fix some issues with modules and MULTI/EXEC (#8617) Bug 1: When a module ctx is freed moduleHandlePropagationAfterCommandCallback is called and handles propagation. We want to prevent it from propagating commands that were not replicated by the same context. Example: 1. module1.foo does: RM_Replicate(cmd1); RM_Call(cmd2); RM_Replicate(cmd3) 2. RM_Replicate(cmd1) propagates MULTI and adds cmd1 to also_propagagte 3. RM_Call(cmd2) create a new ctx, calls call() and destroys the ctx. 4. moduleHandlePropagationAfterCommandCallback is called, calling alsoPropagates EXEC (Note: EXEC is still not written to socket), setting server.in_trnsaction = 0 5. RM_Replicate(cmd3) is called, propagagting yet another MULTI (now we have nested MULTI calls, which is no good) and then cmd3 We must prevent RM_Call(cmd2) from resetting server.in_transaction. REDISMODULE_CTX_MULTI_EMITTED was revived for that purpose. Bug 2: Fix issues with nested RM_Call where some have '!' and some don't. Example: 1. module1.foo does RM_Call of module2.bar without replication (i.e. no '!') 2. module2.bar internally calls RM_Call of INCR with '!' 3. at the end of module1.foo we call RM_ReplicateVerbatim We want the replica/AOF to see only module1.foo and not the INCR from module2.bar Introduced a global replication_allowed flag inside RM_Call to determine whether we need to replicate or not (even if '!' was specified) Other changes: Split beforePropagateMultiOrExec to beforePropagateMulti afterPropagateExec just for better readability
2021-03-10 17:02:17 +01:00
afterPropagateExec();
}
/* Aborts a transaction, with a specific error message.
* The transaction is always aboarted with -EXECABORT so that the client knows
* the server exited the multi state, but the actual reason for the abort is
* included too.
* Note: 'error' may or may not end with \r\n. see addReplyErrorFormat. */
void execCommandAbort(client *c, sds error) {
discardTransaction(c);
if (error[0] == '-') error++;
addReplyErrorFormat(c, "-EXECABORT Transaction discarded because of: %s", error);
/* Send EXEC to clients waiting data from MONITOR. We did send a MULTI
* already, and didn't send any of the queued commands, now we'll just send
* EXEC so it is clear that the transaction is over. */
if (listLength(server.monitors) && !server.loading)
replicationFeedMonitors(c,server.monitors,c->db->id,c->argv,c->argc);
}
void execCommand(client *c) {
int j;
robj **orig_argv;
int orig_argc;
struct redisCommand *orig_cmd;
Fix replication of SLAVEOF inside transaction. In Redis 4.0 replication, with the introduction of PSYNC2, masters and slaves replicate commands to cascading slaves and to the replication backlog itself in a different way compared to the past. Masters actually replicate the effects of client commands. Slaves just propagate what they receive from masters. This mechanism can cause problems when the configuration of an instance is changed from master to slave inside a transaction. For instance we could send to a master instance the following sequence: MULTI SLAVEOF 127.0.0.1 0 EXEC SLAVEOF NO ONE Before the fixes in this commit, the MULTI command used to be propagated into the replication backlog, however after the SLAVEOF command the instance is a slave, so the EXEC implementation failed to also propagate the EXEC command. When the slaves of the above instance reconnected, they were incrementally synchronized just sending a "MULTI". This put the master client (in the slaves) into MULTI state, breaking the replication. Notably even Redis Sentinel uses the above approach in order to guarantee that configuration changes are always performed together with rewrites of the configuration and with clients disconnection. Sentiel does: MULTI SLAVEOF ... CONFIG REWRITE CLIENT KILL TYPE normal EXEC So this was a really problematic issue. However even with the fix in this commit, that will add the final EXEC to the replication stream in case the instance was switched from master to slave during the transaction, the result would be to increment the slave replication offset, so a successive reconnection with the new master, will not permit a successful partial resynchronization: no way the new master can provide us with the backlog needed, we incremented our offset to a value that the new master cannot have. However the EXEC implementation waits to emit the MULTI, so that if the commands inside the transaction actually do not need to be replicated, no commands propagation happens at all. From multi.c: if (!must_propagate && !(c->cmd->flags & (CMD_READONLY|CMD_ADMIN))) { execCommandPropagateMulti(c); must_propagate = 1; } The above code is already modified by this commit you are reading. Now also ADMIN commands do not trigger the emission of MULTI. It is actually not clear why we do not just check for CMD_WRITE... Probably I wrote it this way in order to make the code more reliable: better to over-emit MULTI than not emitting it in time. So this commit should indeed fix issue #3836 (verified), however it looks like some reconsideration of this code path is needed in the long term. BONUS POINT: The reverse bug. Even in a read only slave "B", in a replication setup like: A -> B -> C There are commands without the READONLY nor the ADMIN flag, that are also not flagged as WRITE commands. An example is just the PING command. So if we send B the following sequence: MULTI PING SLAVEOF NO ONE EXEC The result will be the reverse bug, where only EXEC is emitted, but not the previous MULTI. However this apparently does not create problems in practice but it is yet another acknowledge of the fact some work is needed here in order to make this code path less surprising. Note that there are many different approaches we could follow. For instance MULTI/EXEC blocks containing administrative commands may be allowed ONLY if all the commands are administrative ones, otherwise they could be denined. When allowed, the commands could simply never be replicated at all.
2017-07-12 11:07:28 +02:00
int was_master = server.masterhost == NULL;
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
if (!(c->flags & CLIENT_MULTI)) {
addReplyError(c,"EXEC without MULTI");
return;
}
/* Check if we need to abort the EXEC because:
* 1) Some WATCHed key was touched.
* 2) There was a previous error while queueing commands.
* A failed EXEC in the first case returns a multi bulk nil object
* (technically it is not an error but a special behavior), while
* in the second an EXECABORT error is returned. */
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
if (c->flags & (CLIENT_DIRTY_CAS|CLIENT_DIRTY_EXEC)) {
addReply(c, c->flags & CLIENT_DIRTY_EXEC ? shared.execaborterr :
shared.nullarray[c->resp]);
discardTransaction(c);
goto handle_monitor;
}
Unified MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call with respect to blocking commands (#8025) Blocking command should not be used with MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call. This is because, the caller, who executes the command in this context, expects a reply. Today, LUA and MULTI have a special (and different) treatment to blocking commands: LUA - Most commands are marked with no-script flag which are checked when executing and command from LUA, commands that are not marked (like XREAD) verify that their blocking mode is not used inside LUA (by checking the CLIENT_LUA client flag). MULTI - Command that is going to block, first verify that the client is not inside multi (by checking the CLIENT_MULTI client flag). If the client is inside multi, they return a result which is a match to the empty key with no timeout (for example blpop inside MULTI will act as lpop) For modules that perform RM_Call with blocking command, the returned results type is REDISMODULE_REPLY_UNKNOWN and the caller can not really know what happened. Disadvantages of the current state are: No unified approach, LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call, each has a different treatment Module can not safely execute blocking command (and get reply or error). Though It is true that modules are not like LUA or MULTI and should be smarter not to execute blocking commands on RM_Call, sometimes you want to execute a command base on client input (for example if you create a module that provides a new scripting language like javascript or python). While modules (on modules command) can check for REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_LUA or REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_MULTI to know not to block the client, there is no way to check if the command came from another module using RM_Call. So there is no way for a module to know not to block another module RM_Call execution. This commit adds a way to unify the treatment for blocking clients by introducing a new CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING client flag. On LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call the new flag turned on to signify that the client should not be blocked. A blocking command verifies that the flag is turned off before blocking. If a blocking command sees that the CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag is on, it's not blocking and return results which are matches to empty key with no timeout (as MULTI does today). The new flag is checked on the following commands: List blocking commands: BLPOP, BRPOP, BRPOPLPUSH, BLMOVE, Zset blocking commands: BZPOPMIN, BZPOPMAX Stream blocking commands: XREAD, XREADGROUP SUBSCRIBE, PSUBSCRIBE, MONITOR In addition, the new flag is turned on inside the AOF client, we do not want to block the AOF client to prevent deadlocks and commands ordering issues (and there is also an existing assert in the code that verifies it). To keep backward compatibility on LUA, all the no-script flags on existing commands were kept untouched. In addition, a LUA special treatment on XREAD and XREADGROUP was kept. To keep backward compatibility on MULTI (which today allows SUBSCRIBE, and PSUBSCRIBE). We added a special treatment on those commands to allow executing them on MULTI. The only backward compatibility issue that this PR introduces is that now MONITOR is not allowed inside MULTI. Tests were added to verify blocking commands are not blocking the client on LUA, MULTI, or RM_Call. Tests were added to verify the module can check for CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag. Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com> Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com>
2020-11-17 18:58:55 +02:00
uint64_t old_flags = c->flags;
/* we do not want to allow blocking commands inside multi */
c->flags |= CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING;
/* Exec all the queued commands */
unwatchAllKeys(c); /* Unwatch ASAP otherwise we'll waste CPU cycles */
server.in_exec = 1;
orig_argv = c->argv;
orig_argc = c->argc;
orig_cmd = c->cmd;
addReplyArrayLen(c,c->mstate.count);
for (j = 0; j < c->mstate.count; j++) {
c->argc = c->mstate.commands[j].argc;
c->argv = c->mstate.commands[j].argv;
c->cmd = c->mstate.commands[j].cmd;
Adds pub/sub channel patterns to ACL (#7993) Fixes #7923. This PR appropriates the special `&` symbol (because `@` and `*` are taken), followed by a literal value or pattern for describing the Pub/Sub patterns that an ACL user can interact with. It is similar to the existing key patterns mechanism in function (additive) and implementation (copy-pasta). It also adds the allchannels and resetchannels ACL keywords, naturally. The default user is given allchannels permissions, whereas new users get whatever is defined by the acl-pubsub-default configuration directive. For backward compatibility in 6.2, the default of this directive is allchannels but this is likely to be changed to resetchannels in the next major version for stronger default security settings. Unless allchannels is set for the user, channel access permissions are checked as follows : * Calls to both PUBLISH and SUBSCRIBE will fail unless a pattern matching the argumentative channel name(s) exists for the user. * Calls to PSUBSCRIBE will fail unless the pattern(s) provided as an argument literally exist(s) in the user's list. Such failures are logged to the ACL log. Runtime changes to channel permissions for a user with existing subscribing clients cause said clients to disconnect unless the new permissions permit the connections to continue. Note, however, that PSUBSCRIBErs' patterns are matched literally, so given the change bar:* -> b*, pattern subscribers to bar:* will be disconnected. Notes/questions: * UNSUBSCRIBE, PUNSUBSCRIBE and PUBSUB remain unprotected due to lack of reasons for touching them.
2020-12-01 14:21:39 +02:00
/* ACL permissions are also checked at the time of execution in case
* they were changed after the commands were ququed. */
int acl_errpos;
int acl_retval = ACLCheckCommandPerm(c,&acl_errpos);
if (acl_retval == ACL_OK && c->cmd->proc == publishCommand)
acl_retval = ACLCheckPubsubPerm(c,1,1,0,&acl_errpos);
if (acl_retval != ACL_OK) {
Adds pub/sub channel patterns to ACL (#7993) Fixes #7923. This PR appropriates the special `&` symbol (because `@` and `*` are taken), followed by a literal value or pattern for describing the Pub/Sub patterns that an ACL user can interact with. It is similar to the existing key patterns mechanism in function (additive) and implementation (copy-pasta). It also adds the allchannels and resetchannels ACL keywords, naturally. The default user is given allchannels permissions, whereas new users get whatever is defined by the acl-pubsub-default configuration directive. For backward compatibility in 6.2, the default of this directive is allchannels but this is likely to be changed to resetchannels in the next major version for stronger default security settings. Unless allchannels is set for the user, channel access permissions are checked as follows : * Calls to both PUBLISH and SUBSCRIBE will fail unless a pattern matching the argumentative channel name(s) exists for the user. * Calls to PSUBSCRIBE will fail unless the pattern(s) provided as an argument literally exist(s) in the user's list. Such failures are logged to the ACL log. Runtime changes to channel permissions for a user with existing subscribing clients cause said clients to disconnect unless the new permissions permit the connections to continue. Note, however, that PSUBSCRIBErs' patterns are matched literally, so given the change bar:* -> b*, pattern subscribers to bar:* will be disconnected. Notes/questions: * UNSUBSCRIBE, PUNSUBSCRIBE and PUBSUB remain unprotected due to lack of reasons for touching them.
2020-12-01 14:21:39 +02:00
char *reason;
switch (acl_retval) {
case ACL_DENIED_CMD:
reason = "no permission to execute the command or subcommand";
break;
case ACL_DENIED_KEY:
reason = "no permission to touch the specified keys";
break;
case ACL_DENIED_CHANNEL:
reason = "no permission to publish to the specified channel";
break;
default:
reason = "no permission";
break;
}
addACLLogEntry(c,acl_retval,acl_errpos,NULL);
addReplyErrorFormat(c,
"-NOPERM ACLs rules changed between the moment the "
"transaction was accumulated and the EXEC call. "
"This command is no longer allowed for the "
Adds pub/sub channel patterns to ACL (#7993) Fixes #7923. This PR appropriates the special `&` symbol (because `@` and `*` are taken), followed by a literal value or pattern for describing the Pub/Sub patterns that an ACL user can interact with. It is similar to the existing key patterns mechanism in function (additive) and implementation (copy-pasta). It also adds the allchannels and resetchannels ACL keywords, naturally. The default user is given allchannels permissions, whereas new users get whatever is defined by the acl-pubsub-default configuration directive. For backward compatibility in 6.2, the default of this directive is allchannels but this is likely to be changed to resetchannels in the next major version for stronger default security settings. Unless allchannels is set for the user, channel access permissions are checked as follows : * Calls to both PUBLISH and SUBSCRIBE will fail unless a pattern matching the argumentative channel name(s) exists for the user. * Calls to PSUBSCRIBE will fail unless the pattern(s) provided as an argument literally exist(s) in the user's list. Such failures are logged to the ACL log. Runtime changes to channel permissions for a user with existing subscribing clients cause said clients to disconnect unless the new permissions permit the connections to continue. Note, however, that PSUBSCRIBErs' patterns are matched literally, so given the change bar:* -> b*, pattern subscribers to bar:* will be disconnected. Notes/questions: * UNSUBSCRIBE, PUNSUBSCRIBE and PUBSUB remain unprotected due to lack of reasons for touching them.
2020-12-01 14:21:39 +02:00
"following reason: %s", reason);
} else {
call(c,server.loading ? CMD_CALL_NONE : CMD_CALL_FULL);
Unified MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call with respect to blocking commands (#8025) Blocking command should not be used with MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call. This is because, the caller, who executes the command in this context, expects a reply. Today, LUA and MULTI have a special (and different) treatment to blocking commands: LUA - Most commands are marked with no-script flag which are checked when executing and command from LUA, commands that are not marked (like XREAD) verify that their blocking mode is not used inside LUA (by checking the CLIENT_LUA client flag). MULTI - Command that is going to block, first verify that the client is not inside multi (by checking the CLIENT_MULTI client flag). If the client is inside multi, they return a result which is a match to the empty key with no timeout (for example blpop inside MULTI will act as lpop) For modules that perform RM_Call with blocking command, the returned results type is REDISMODULE_REPLY_UNKNOWN and the caller can not really know what happened. Disadvantages of the current state are: No unified approach, LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call, each has a different treatment Module can not safely execute blocking command (and get reply or error). Though It is true that modules are not like LUA or MULTI and should be smarter not to execute blocking commands on RM_Call, sometimes you want to execute a command base on client input (for example if you create a module that provides a new scripting language like javascript or python). While modules (on modules command) can check for REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_LUA or REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_MULTI to know not to block the client, there is no way to check if the command came from another module using RM_Call. So there is no way for a module to know not to block another module RM_Call execution. This commit adds a way to unify the treatment for blocking clients by introducing a new CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING client flag. On LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call the new flag turned on to signify that the client should not be blocked. A blocking command verifies that the flag is turned off before blocking. If a blocking command sees that the CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag is on, it's not blocking and return results which are matches to empty key with no timeout (as MULTI does today). The new flag is checked on the following commands: List blocking commands: BLPOP, BRPOP, BRPOPLPUSH, BLMOVE, Zset blocking commands: BZPOPMIN, BZPOPMAX Stream blocking commands: XREAD, XREADGROUP SUBSCRIBE, PSUBSCRIBE, MONITOR In addition, the new flag is turned on inside the AOF client, we do not want to block the AOF client to prevent deadlocks and commands ordering issues (and there is also an existing assert in the code that verifies it). To keep backward compatibility on LUA, all the no-script flags on existing commands were kept untouched. In addition, a LUA special treatment on XREAD and XREADGROUP was kept. To keep backward compatibility on MULTI (which today allows SUBSCRIBE, and PSUBSCRIBE). We added a special treatment on those commands to allow executing them on MULTI. The only backward compatibility issue that this PR introduces is that now MONITOR is not allowed inside MULTI. Tests were added to verify blocking commands are not blocking the client on LUA, MULTI, or RM_Call. Tests were added to verify the module can check for CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag. Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com> Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com>
2020-11-17 18:58:55 +02:00
serverAssert((c->flags & CLIENT_BLOCKED) == 0);
}
/* Commands may alter argc/argv, restore mstate. */
c->mstate.commands[j].argc = c->argc;
c->mstate.commands[j].argv = c->argv;
c->mstate.commands[j].cmd = c->cmd;
}
Unified MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call with respect to blocking commands (#8025) Blocking command should not be used with MULTI, LUA, and RM_Call. This is because, the caller, who executes the command in this context, expects a reply. Today, LUA and MULTI have a special (and different) treatment to blocking commands: LUA - Most commands are marked with no-script flag which are checked when executing and command from LUA, commands that are not marked (like XREAD) verify that their blocking mode is not used inside LUA (by checking the CLIENT_LUA client flag). MULTI - Command that is going to block, first verify that the client is not inside multi (by checking the CLIENT_MULTI client flag). If the client is inside multi, they return a result which is a match to the empty key with no timeout (for example blpop inside MULTI will act as lpop) For modules that perform RM_Call with blocking command, the returned results type is REDISMODULE_REPLY_UNKNOWN and the caller can not really know what happened. Disadvantages of the current state are: No unified approach, LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call, each has a different treatment Module can not safely execute blocking command (and get reply or error). Though It is true that modules are not like LUA or MULTI and should be smarter not to execute blocking commands on RM_Call, sometimes you want to execute a command base on client input (for example if you create a module that provides a new scripting language like javascript or python). While modules (on modules command) can check for REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_LUA or REDISMODULE_CTX_FLAGS_MULTI to know not to block the client, there is no way to check if the command came from another module using RM_Call. So there is no way for a module to know not to block another module RM_Call execution. This commit adds a way to unify the treatment for blocking clients by introducing a new CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING client flag. On LUA, MULTI, and RM_Call the new flag turned on to signify that the client should not be blocked. A blocking command verifies that the flag is turned off before blocking. If a blocking command sees that the CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag is on, it's not blocking and return results which are matches to empty key with no timeout (as MULTI does today). The new flag is checked on the following commands: List blocking commands: BLPOP, BRPOP, BRPOPLPUSH, BLMOVE, Zset blocking commands: BZPOPMIN, BZPOPMAX Stream blocking commands: XREAD, XREADGROUP SUBSCRIBE, PSUBSCRIBE, MONITOR In addition, the new flag is turned on inside the AOF client, we do not want to block the AOF client to prevent deadlocks and commands ordering issues (and there is also an existing assert in the code that verifies it). To keep backward compatibility on LUA, all the no-script flags on existing commands were kept untouched. In addition, a LUA special treatment on XREAD and XREADGROUP was kept. To keep backward compatibility on MULTI (which today allows SUBSCRIBE, and PSUBSCRIBE). We added a special treatment on those commands to allow executing them on MULTI. The only backward compatibility issue that this PR introduces is that now MONITOR is not allowed inside MULTI. Tests were added to verify blocking commands are not blocking the client on LUA, MULTI, or RM_Call. Tests were added to verify the module can check for CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING flag. Co-authored-by: Oran Agra <oran@redislabs.com> Co-authored-by: Itamar Haber <itamar@redislabs.com>
2020-11-17 18:58:55 +02:00
// restore old DENY_BLOCKING value
if (!(old_flags & CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING))
c->flags &= ~CLIENT_DENY_BLOCKING;
c->argv = orig_argv;
c->argc = orig_argc;
c->cmd = orig_cmd;
discardTransaction(c);
Fix replication of SLAVEOF inside transaction. In Redis 4.0 replication, with the introduction of PSYNC2, masters and slaves replicate commands to cascading slaves and to the replication backlog itself in a different way compared to the past. Masters actually replicate the effects of client commands. Slaves just propagate what they receive from masters. This mechanism can cause problems when the configuration of an instance is changed from master to slave inside a transaction. For instance we could send to a master instance the following sequence: MULTI SLAVEOF 127.0.0.1 0 EXEC SLAVEOF NO ONE Before the fixes in this commit, the MULTI command used to be propagated into the replication backlog, however after the SLAVEOF command the instance is a slave, so the EXEC implementation failed to also propagate the EXEC command. When the slaves of the above instance reconnected, they were incrementally synchronized just sending a "MULTI". This put the master client (in the slaves) into MULTI state, breaking the replication. Notably even Redis Sentinel uses the above approach in order to guarantee that configuration changes are always performed together with rewrites of the configuration and with clients disconnection. Sentiel does: MULTI SLAVEOF ... CONFIG REWRITE CLIENT KILL TYPE normal EXEC So this was a really problematic issue. However even with the fix in this commit, that will add the final EXEC to the replication stream in case the instance was switched from master to slave during the transaction, the result would be to increment the slave replication offset, so a successive reconnection with the new master, will not permit a successful partial resynchronization: no way the new master can provide us with the backlog needed, we incremented our offset to a value that the new master cannot have. However the EXEC implementation waits to emit the MULTI, so that if the commands inside the transaction actually do not need to be replicated, no commands propagation happens at all. From multi.c: if (!must_propagate && !(c->cmd->flags & (CMD_READONLY|CMD_ADMIN))) { execCommandPropagateMulti(c); must_propagate = 1; } The above code is already modified by this commit you are reading. Now also ADMIN commands do not trigger the emission of MULTI. It is actually not clear why we do not just check for CMD_WRITE... Probably I wrote it this way in order to make the code more reliable: better to over-emit MULTI than not emitting it in time. So this commit should indeed fix issue #3836 (verified), however it looks like some reconsideration of this code path is needed in the long term. BONUS POINT: The reverse bug. Even in a read only slave "B", in a replication setup like: A -> B -> C There are commands without the READONLY nor the ADMIN flag, that are also not flagged as WRITE commands. An example is just the PING command. So if we send B the following sequence: MULTI PING SLAVEOF NO ONE EXEC The result will be the reverse bug, where only EXEC is emitted, but not the previous MULTI. However this apparently does not create problems in practice but it is yet another acknowledge of the fact some work is needed here in order to make this code path less surprising. Note that there are many different approaches we could follow. For instance MULTI/EXEC blocks containing administrative commands may be allowed ONLY if all the commands are administrative ones, otherwise they could be denined. When allowed, the commands could simply never be replicated at all.
2017-07-12 11:07:28 +02:00
/* Make sure the EXEC command will be propagated as well if MULTI
* was already propagated. */
Remove read-only flag from non-keyspace cmds, different approach for EXEC to propagate MULTI (#8216) In the distant history there was only the read flag for commands, and whatever command that didn't have the read flag was a write one. Then we added the write flag, but some portions of the code still used !read Also some commands that don't work on the keyspace at all, still have the read flag. Changes in this commit: 1. remove the read-only flag from TIME, ECHO, ROLE and LASTSAVE 2. EXEC command used to decides if it should propagate a MULTI by looking at the command flags (!read & !admin). When i was about to change it to look at the write flag instead, i realized that this would cause it not to propagate a MULTI for PUBLISH, EVAL, and SCRIPT, all 3 are not marked as either a read command or a write one (as they should), but all 3 are calling forceCommandPropagation. So instead of introducing a new flag to denote a command that "writes" but not into the keyspace, and still needs propagation, i decided to rely on the forceCommandPropagation, and just fix the code to propagate MULTI when needed rather than depending on the command flags at all. The implication of my change then is that now it won't decide to propagate MULTI when it sees one of these: SELECT, PING, INFO, COMMAND, TIME and other commands which are neither read nor write. 3. Changing getNodeByQuery and clusterRedirectBlockedClientIfNeeded in cluster.c to look at !write rather than read flag. This should have no implications, since these code paths are only reachable for commands which access keys, and these are always marked as either read or write. This commit improve MULTI propagation tests, for modules and a bunch of other special cases, all of which used to pass already before that commit. the only one that test change that uncovered a change of behavior is the one that DELs a non-existing key, it used to propagate an empty multi-exec block, and no longer does.
2020-12-22 12:03:49 +02:00
if (server.propagate_in_transaction) {
Fix replication of SLAVEOF inside transaction. In Redis 4.0 replication, with the introduction of PSYNC2, masters and slaves replicate commands to cascading slaves and to the replication backlog itself in a different way compared to the past. Masters actually replicate the effects of client commands. Slaves just propagate what they receive from masters. This mechanism can cause problems when the configuration of an instance is changed from master to slave inside a transaction. For instance we could send to a master instance the following sequence: MULTI SLAVEOF 127.0.0.1 0 EXEC SLAVEOF NO ONE Before the fixes in this commit, the MULTI command used to be propagated into the replication backlog, however after the SLAVEOF command the instance is a slave, so the EXEC implementation failed to also propagate the EXEC command. When the slaves of the above instance reconnected, they were incrementally synchronized just sending a "MULTI". This put the master client (in the slaves) into MULTI state, breaking the replication. Notably even Redis Sentinel uses the above approach in order to guarantee that configuration changes are always performed together with rewrites of the configuration and with clients disconnection. Sentiel does: MULTI SLAVEOF ... CONFIG REWRITE CLIENT KILL TYPE normal EXEC So this was a really problematic issue. However even with the fix in this commit, that will add the final EXEC to the replication stream in case the instance was switched from master to slave during the transaction, the result would be to increment the slave replication offset, so a successive reconnection with the new master, will not permit a successful partial resynchronization: no way the new master can provide us with the backlog needed, we incremented our offset to a value that the new master cannot have. However the EXEC implementation waits to emit the MULTI, so that if the commands inside the transaction actually do not need to be replicated, no commands propagation happens at all. From multi.c: if (!must_propagate && !(c->cmd->flags & (CMD_READONLY|CMD_ADMIN))) { execCommandPropagateMulti(c); must_propagate = 1; } The above code is already modified by this commit you are reading. Now also ADMIN commands do not trigger the emission of MULTI. It is actually not clear why we do not just check for CMD_WRITE... Probably I wrote it this way in order to make the code more reliable: better to over-emit MULTI than not emitting it in time. So this commit should indeed fix issue #3836 (verified), however it looks like some reconsideration of this code path is needed in the long term. BONUS POINT: The reverse bug. Even in a read only slave "B", in a replication setup like: A -> B -> C There are commands without the READONLY nor the ADMIN flag, that are also not flagged as WRITE commands. An example is just the PING command. So if we send B the following sequence: MULTI PING SLAVEOF NO ONE EXEC The result will be the reverse bug, where only EXEC is emitted, but not the previous MULTI. However this apparently does not create problems in practice but it is yet another acknowledge of the fact some work is needed here in order to make this code path less surprising. Note that there are many different approaches we could follow. For instance MULTI/EXEC blocks containing administrative commands may be allowed ONLY if all the commands are administrative ones, otherwise they could be denined. When allowed, the commands could simply never be replicated at all.
2017-07-12 11:07:28 +02:00
int is_master = server.masterhost == NULL;
server.dirty++;
/* If inside the MULTI/EXEC block this instance was suddenly
* switched from master to slave (using the SLAVEOF command), the
* initial MULTI was propagated into the replication backlog, but the
* rest was not. We need to make sure to at least terminate the
* backlog with the final EXEC. */
if (server.repl_backlog && was_master && !is_master) {
char *execcmd = "*1\r\n$4\r\nEXEC\r\n";
feedReplicationBacklog(execcmd,strlen(execcmd));
}
Fix some issues with modules and MULTI/EXEC (#8617) Bug 1: When a module ctx is freed moduleHandlePropagationAfterCommandCallback is called and handles propagation. We want to prevent it from propagating commands that were not replicated by the same context. Example: 1. module1.foo does: RM_Replicate(cmd1); RM_Call(cmd2); RM_Replicate(cmd3) 2. RM_Replicate(cmd1) propagates MULTI and adds cmd1 to also_propagagte 3. RM_Call(cmd2) create a new ctx, calls call() and destroys the ctx. 4. moduleHandlePropagationAfterCommandCallback is called, calling alsoPropagates EXEC (Note: EXEC is still not written to socket), setting server.in_trnsaction = 0 5. RM_Replicate(cmd3) is called, propagagting yet another MULTI (now we have nested MULTI calls, which is no good) and then cmd3 We must prevent RM_Call(cmd2) from resetting server.in_transaction. REDISMODULE_CTX_MULTI_EMITTED was revived for that purpose. Bug 2: Fix issues with nested RM_Call where some have '!' and some don't. Example: 1. module1.foo does RM_Call of module2.bar without replication (i.e. no '!') 2. module2.bar internally calls RM_Call of INCR with '!' 3. at the end of module1.foo we call RM_ReplicateVerbatim We want the replica/AOF to see only module1.foo and not the INCR from module2.bar Introduced a global replication_allowed flag inside RM_Call to determine whether we need to replicate or not (even if '!' was specified) Other changes: Split beforePropagateMultiOrExec to beforePropagateMulti afterPropagateExec just for better readability
2021-03-10 17:02:17 +01:00
afterPropagateExec();
Fix replication of SLAVEOF inside transaction. In Redis 4.0 replication, with the introduction of PSYNC2, masters and slaves replicate commands to cascading slaves and to the replication backlog itself in a different way compared to the past. Masters actually replicate the effects of client commands. Slaves just propagate what they receive from masters. This mechanism can cause problems when the configuration of an instance is changed from master to slave inside a transaction. For instance we could send to a master instance the following sequence: MULTI SLAVEOF 127.0.0.1 0 EXEC SLAVEOF NO ONE Before the fixes in this commit, the MULTI command used to be propagated into the replication backlog, however after the SLAVEOF command the instance is a slave, so the EXEC implementation failed to also propagate the EXEC command. When the slaves of the above instance reconnected, they were incrementally synchronized just sending a "MULTI". This put the master client (in the slaves) into MULTI state, breaking the replication. Notably even Redis Sentinel uses the above approach in order to guarantee that configuration changes are always performed together with rewrites of the configuration and with clients disconnection. Sentiel does: MULTI SLAVEOF ... CONFIG REWRITE CLIENT KILL TYPE normal EXEC So this was a really problematic issue. However even with the fix in this commit, that will add the final EXEC to the replication stream in case the instance was switched from master to slave during the transaction, the result would be to increment the slave replication offset, so a successive reconnection with the new master, will not permit a successful partial resynchronization: no way the new master can provide us with the backlog needed, we incremented our offset to a value that the new master cannot have. However the EXEC implementation waits to emit the MULTI, so that if the commands inside the transaction actually do not need to be replicated, no commands propagation happens at all. From multi.c: if (!must_propagate && !(c->cmd->flags & (CMD_READONLY|CMD_ADMIN))) { execCommandPropagateMulti(c); must_propagate = 1; } The above code is already modified by this commit you are reading. Now also ADMIN commands do not trigger the emission of MULTI. It is actually not clear why we do not just check for CMD_WRITE... Probably I wrote it this way in order to make the code more reliable: better to over-emit MULTI than not emitting it in time. So this commit should indeed fix issue #3836 (verified), however it looks like some reconsideration of this code path is needed in the long term. BONUS POINT: The reverse bug. Even in a read only slave "B", in a replication setup like: A -> B -> C There are commands without the READONLY nor the ADMIN flag, that are also not flagged as WRITE commands. An example is just the PING command. So if we send B the following sequence: MULTI PING SLAVEOF NO ONE EXEC The result will be the reverse bug, where only EXEC is emitted, but not the previous MULTI. However this apparently does not create problems in practice but it is yet another acknowledge of the fact some work is needed here in order to make this code path less surprising. Note that there are many different approaches we could follow. For instance MULTI/EXEC blocks containing administrative commands may be allowed ONLY if all the commands are administrative ones, otherwise they could be denined. When allowed, the commands could simply never be replicated at all.
2017-07-12 11:07:28 +02:00
}
server.in_exec = 0;
handle_monitor:
/* Send EXEC to clients waiting data from MONITOR. We do it here
* since the natural order of commands execution is actually:
* MUTLI, EXEC, ... commands inside transaction ...
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
* Instead EXEC is flagged as CMD_SKIP_MONITOR in the command
* table, and we do it here with correct ordering. */
if (listLength(server.monitors) && !server.loading)
replicationFeedMonitors(c,server.monitors,c->db->id,c->argv,c->argc);
}
/* ===================== WATCH (CAS alike for MULTI/EXEC) ===================
*
* The implementation uses a per-DB hash table mapping keys to list of clients
* WATCHing those keys, so that given a key that is going to be modified
* we can mark all the associated clients as dirty.
*
* Also every client contains a list of WATCHed keys so that's possible to
* un-watch such keys when the client is freed or when UNWATCH is called. */
/* In the client->watched_keys list we need to use watchedKey structures
* as in order to identify a key in Redis we need both the key name and the
* DB */
typedef struct watchedKey {
robj *key;
redisDb *db;
} watchedKey;
/* Watch for the specified key */
void watchForKey(client *c, robj *key) {
list *clients = NULL;
listIter li;
listNode *ln;
watchedKey *wk;
/* Check if we are already watching for this key */
listRewind(c->watched_keys,&li);
while((ln = listNext(&li))) {
wk = listNodeValue(ln);
if (wk->db == c->db && equalStringObjects(key,wk->key))
return; /* Key already watched */
}
/* This key is not already watched in this DB. Let's add it */
clients = dictFetchValue(c->db->watched_keys,key);
if (!clients) {
clients = listCreate();
dictAdd(c->db->watched_keys,key,clients);
incrRefCount(key);
}
listAddNodeTail(clients,c);
2013-01-17 01:00:20 +08:00
/* Add the new key to the list of keys watched by this client */
wk = zmalloc(sizeof(*wk));
wk->key = key;
wk->db = c->db;
incrRefCount(key);
listAddNodeTail(c->watched_keys,wk);
}
/* Unwatch all the keys watched by this client. To clean the EXEC dirty
* flag is up to the caller. */
void unwatchAllKeys(client *c) {
listIter li;
listNode *ln;
if (listLength(c->watched_keys) == 0) return;
listRewind(c->watched_keys,&li);
while((ln = listNext(&li))) {
list *clients;
watchedKey *wk;
/* Lookup the watched key -> clients list and remove the client
* from the list */
wk = listNodeValue(ln);
clients = dictFetchValue(wk->db->watched_keys, wk->key);
2015-07-26 15:29:53 +02:00
serverAssertWithInfo(c,NULL,clients != NULL);
listDelNode(clients,listSearchKey(clients,c));
/* Kill the entry at all if this was the only client */
if (listLength(clients) == 0)
dictDelete(wk->db->watched_keys, wk->key);
/* Remove this watched key from the client->watched list */
listDelNode(c->watched_keys,ln);
decrRefCount(wk->key);
zfree(wk);
}
}
/* "Touch" a key, so that if this key is being WATCHed by some client the
* next EXEC will fail. */
void touchWatchedKey(redisDb *db, robj *key) {
list *clients;
listIter li;
listNode *ln;
if (dictSize(db->watched_keys) == 0) return;
clients = dictFetchValue(db->watched_keys, key);
if (!clients) return;
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
/* Mark all the clients watching this key as CLIENT_DIRTY_CAS */
/* Check if we are already watching for this key */
listRewind(clients,&li);
while((ln = listNext(&li))) {
client *c = listNodeValue(ln);
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
c->flags |= CLIENT_DIRTY_CAS;
}
}
/* Set CLIENT_DIRTY_CAS to all clients of DB when DB is dirty.
* It may happen in the following situations:
* FLUSHDB, FLUSHALL, SWAPDB
*
* replaced_with: for SWAPDB, the WATCH should be invalidated if
* the key exists in either of them, and skipped only if it
* doesn't exist in both. */
void touchAllWatchedKeysInDb(redisDb *emptied, redisDb *replaced_with) {
listIter li;
listNode *ln;
dictEntry *de;
if (dictSize(emptied->watched_keys) == 0) return;
dictIterator *di = dictGetSafeIterator(emptied->watched_keys);
while((de = dictNext(di)) != NULL) {
robj *key = dictGetKey(de);
list *clients = dictGetVal(de);
if (!clients) continue;
listRewind(clients,&li);
while((ln = listNext(&li))) {
client *c = listNodeValue(ln);
if (dictFind(emptied->dict, key->ptr)) {
c->flags |= CLIENT_DIRTY_CAS;
} else if (replaced_with && dictFind(replaced_with->dict, key->ptr)) {
c->flags |= CLIENT_DIRTY_CAS;
}
}
}
dictReleaseIterator(di);
}
void watchCommand(client *c) {
int j;
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
if (c->flags & CLIENT_MULTI) {
addReplyError(c,"WATCH inside MULTI is not allowed");
return;
}
for (j = 1; j < c->argc; j++)
watchForKey(c,c->argv[j]);
addReply(c,shared.ok);
}
void unwatchCommand(client *c) {
unwatchAllKeys(c);
2015-07-27 09:41:48 +02:00
c->flags &= (~CLIENT_DIRTY_CAS);
addReply(c,shared.ok);
}